iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: DirtyMustachio on March 13, 2014, 08:49:12 PM

Title: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 13, 2014, 08:49:12 PM
W Aura Beatdown

60 cards, 15 sideboard


3 {Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx}
17 {Plains}

20 lands


2 {Heliod, God of the Sun}
4 {Hopeful Eidolon}
2 {Ajani's Chosen}
4 {Spirit of the Labyrinth}
4 {Hero of Iroas}
4 {Eidolon of Countless Battles}

20 creatures


4 {Pacifism}
4 {Ethereal Armor}
2 {Sphere of Safety}
4 {Brave the Elements}
3 {Gift of Orzhova}
3 {Elspeth, Sun's Champion}

20 other spells


Sideboard

3 {Rootborn Defenses}
4 {Silence}
4 {celestial flare}
4 {arrest}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:
My brothers deck any help appreciated
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Bookmeister on March 15, 2014, 10:19:55 PM
You are going to get killed by {Stormbreath Dragon} and {Blood Baron of Vizkopa}. I would splash red for {Mizzium Mortars}.
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Sparkle Ninja on March 15, 2014, 11:02:34 PM
Quote from: Bookmeister on March 15, 2014, 10:19:55 PM
You are going to get killed by {Stormbreath Dragon} and {Blood Baron of Vizkopa}. I would splash red for {Mizzium Mortars}.
Thats why there's {celestial flare} and {sphere of safety} in there
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 16, 2014, 11:03:11 AM
Yeah, and I'm considering doing red when we see this new ajani, or maybe fated retribution in sideboard, which would be choice against red/green anyway
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 16, 2014, 03:44:35 PM
I really like this, I have been trying to design something similar. I may have to try this out at FNM next week...
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 16, 2014, 03:57:02 PM
Keep me posted  and let me know any changes you make and how you do
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Sto5rm on March 16, 2014, 06:41:57 PM
It's good.
Made my mono black aggro deck sweat all 3 games
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 04:26:05 PM
Here is my idea of where the deck could go: run 4x {Sacred Foundry} and 4x {Temple of Triumph} in the mainboard. This would allow you to do some odd things with red in the sideboard, like run {Aurelia's Fury}, {Assemble the Legion}, {Boros Charm} (against control, running two sets of indestructibilities will destroy them) and a {Chained to the Rocks} (in the mainboard, instead of {Pacifism})
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Ekann1 on March 23, 2014, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 04:26:05 PM
a {Chained to the Rocks} (in the mainboard, instead of {Pacifism})
Can you do this with only 4 mountains?
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 09:03:03 PM
Quote from: E.kann1 on March 23, 2014, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 04:26:05 PM
a {Chained to the Rocks} (in the mainboard, instead of {Pacifism})
Can you do this with only 4 mountains?
I have been playtesting it with 2 {Chained to the Rocks} and 2 {Pacifism} and it has been working pretty well for me so far. I might add 2 Mountains though.
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Ekann1 on March 23, 2014, 09:42:04 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 09:03:03 PM
Quote from: E.kann1 on March 23, 2014, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 04:26:05 PM
a {Chained to the Rocks} (in the mainboard, instead of {Pacifism})
Can you do this with only 4 mountains?
I have been playtesting it with 2 {Chained to the Rocks} and 2 {Pacifism} and it has been working pretty well for me so far. I might add 2 Mountains though.
That sounds ok. I was thinking about the full set of them and was wondering how consistent that would be...
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 10:04:17 PM
Quote from: E.kann1 on March 23, 2014, 09:42:04 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 09:03:03 PM
Quote from: E.kann1 on March 23, 2014, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 23, 2014, 04:26:05 PM
a {Chained to the Rocks} (in the mainboard, instead of {Pacifism})
Can you do this with only 4 mountains?
I have been playtesting it with 2 {Chained to the Rocks} and 2 {Pacifism} and it has been working pretty well for me so far. I might add 2 Mountains though.
That sounds ok. I was thinking about the full set of them and was wondering how consistent that would be...
I am still working with it, and I am trying to make the sideboard so that game 2 it is a completely different deck, so they can't just board against me. Playing around with everything including {Foundry Champion}, {Acolyte's Reward} and {Auramancer}, I'll report on how it goes. The main deck I am working with is slightly different too, here are my changes (I don't know if I will keep it this way and some of these are meta calls):
-1 {Spirit of the Labyrinth}
-4 {Hero of Iroas}
-3 {Gift of Orzhova}
-8 Plains

+4 {Rootborn Defences} (way too many control decks in my area not to...)
+2 {Archetype of Courage} (I think with this dude, my match-ups against other creature deck are more one-sided)
+2 {Ajani's Chosen} (his is a ETB ability, so even {Heliod, God of the Sun's} ability triggers it and you can get a critical mass of tokens really quick)
+4 {Sacred Foundry}
+2 {Temple of Triumph}
+2 {Mountain}
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 24, 2014, 09:10:44 AM
Maybe no temples are really necessary it's pretty Aggro so four mountains instead of the temples might work
Title: Re: W Aura Beatdown
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 24, 2014, 03:44:56 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on March 24, 2014, 09:10:44 AM
Maybe no temples are really necessary it's pretty Aggro so four mountains instead of the temples might work
Like I said, still working on it. Also, my deck is more of a midrange.