iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: Blackyzilla on March 26, 2012, 08:44:44 PM

Title: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 26, 2012, 08:44:44 PM

Vamp Control

75 cards, 15 sideboard


2 {Stensia Bloodhall}
4 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
4 {Dragonskull Summit}
5 {Swamp}
7 {Mountain}

22 lands


3 {Grim Lavamancer}
3 {Blood Seeker}
3 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
4 {Stromkirk Noble}
4 {Stromkirk Captain}
2 {Bloodline Keeper}

19 creatures


3 {Shrine of Burning Rage}
3 {Volt Charge}
2 {Arc Trail}
2 {Brimstone Volley}
3 {Shock}
1 {Doom Blade}
1 {Tragic Slip}
2 {Tribute to Hunger}
2 {Go for the Throat}

19 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Ancient Grudge}
2 {Grafdigger's Cage}
1 {Brimstone Volley}
3 {Dismember}
3 {Despise}
1 {Tribute to Hunger}
1 {Arc Trail}
2 {Traitorous Blood}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:
Black red vamps my take anyway.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 26, 2012, 10:16:58 PM
Any suggestions
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 27, 2012, 06:45:43 PM
No One has anything to say about this deck :o
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Drecoterie on March 27, 2012, 07:34:38 PM
Quote from: Blackyzilla on March 26, 2012, 08:44:44 PM

Vamp Control

60 cards, 0 sideboard


2 {Isolated Chapel}
3 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
4 {Dragonskull Summit}
7 {Swamp}
6 {Mountain}

22 lands


2 {Manic Vandal}
1 {Olivia Voldaren}
3 {Blood Seeker}
3 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
4 {Stromkirk Noble}
3 {Stromkirk Captain}
2 {Bloodline Keeper}

18 creatures


3 {Volt Charge}
2 {Sorin, Lord of Innistrad}
1 {Doom Blade}
2 {Ratchet Bomb}
4 {Sphere of the Suns}
1 {Tragic Slip}
3 {Curse of Stalked Prey}
2 {Tribute to Hunger}
2 {Go for the Throat}

20 other spells


Sideboard

Notes:
Black red vamps my take anyway.

I'm running a R/B/w vap deck as well. I think that you coul do without {Falkenrath Aristocrat} and possibly another Olivia. I like the idea of {Manic Vandal}, I'm running an ancient grudge and shimmering grotto. I'm also running 3 liliana's but I think {Tribute to Hunger} might be more effective. May I suggest more burn spells like brimstone volley it's a really grat card, and arc tail. I have a deck like I could post to compare notes. Thanks for the post I'm trying to make a really strong vap deck and your post helped.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 28, 2012, 11:30:59 PM
Lose the white, wait till avacyn restored.. Sorin doesn't do anything for synergy he just puts out tokens, your better with bloodline keepers vs sorin
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:23:39 AM
Deck updated no Sorin more burn oh yeah. Please comment need the help getting tired if wolf run really wanna play this deck have all the cards just needs tweeking
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on March 30, 2012, 01:31:00 AM
Quote from: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:23:39 AM
Deck updated no Sorin more burn oh yeah. Please comment need the help getting tired if wolf run really wanna play this deck have all the cards just needs tweeking
I like the update more then the BRW vamps deck you posted first. I think the deck needs 2 more {Olivia Voldarren} and at least 1 more {Falkenrath Aristrocate}.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:43:17 AM
Updated only 1 more Olivia because she is legendary don't want to many in hand can't drop them 1 more arist is great is 22 land good top cast in deck is 4 mana
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on March 30, 2012, 01:52:00 AM
Put {Manic Vandel} in the side board if after testing having 22 lands is a problem. Test play the deck first.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:55:42 AM
Only reason I have 2 main board every deck has some sort of artifact and I need a human to pitch to arist it works well with just 2 main
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:58:29 AM
Now with sideboard
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on March 30, 2012, 02:01:41 AM
Quote from: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 01:55:42 AM
Only reason I have 2 main board every deck has some sort of artifact and I need a human to pitch to arist it works well with just 2 main
I'm only saying if you are having mana issues move them to the side board. If you don't have any mana issues after test playing it then don't move them to the side board.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 02:03:19 AM
Ok for sure
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Drecoterie on March 30, 2012, 06:45:46 AM
{priest of urabrask} would be a good card instead of the current human you have in your deck. You can use the mana to do burn or to cast the aristorcat and if you face an artifact in the first game you can sideboar him out.
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 11:53:28 AM
I like this Idea will try it out online but I like manic main board usually no problem with mana but like the idea of a 2 for 1
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 30, 2012, 12:00:25 PM
Might go with {Grim lavamancer} for a good human to maybe replace manic
Title: Re: Vamp Control
Post by: Blackyzilla on March 31, 2012, 02:26:03 AM
Updated please comment