Text only | Text with Images

iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Casual => Topic started by: 5/9 Turtle on November 23, 2013, 05:30:03 PM

Title: Blue Artifact
Post by: 5/9 Turtle on November 23, 2013, 05:30:03 PM

Blue Artifact

63 cards, 0 sideboard


17 {Island}
2 {Gargoyle Castle}
2 {Seat of the Synod}
21 lands


1 {Memnarch}
2 {Trinket Mage}
2 {Grand Architect}
2 {Master of Etherium}
2 {Etherium Sculptor}
2 {Silver Myr}
1 {Quicksilver Gargantuan}
1 {Mirran Spy}
1 {Thopter Assembly}
1 {Riddlesmith}
1 {Steel Overseer}
1 {Darksteel Juggernaut}
2 {Brass Squire}
1 {Sharding Sphinx}
2 {Spellskite}
2 {Trespassing Souleater}
2 {Spire Serpent}
1 {Master Transmuter}
2 {Etched Champion}
29 creatures


1 {Argentum Armor}
1 {Tezzeret the Seeker}
1 {Unwinding Clock}
1 {Accorder's Shield}
1 {Worldslayer}
1 {Darksteel Axe}
1 {Sword of Feast and Famine}
1 {Mirrorworks}
1 {Quicksilver Amulet}
1 {Quietus Spike}
1 {Karn Liberated}
1 {Prototype Portal}
1 {Mox Opal}
13 other spells


Sideboard
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: 5/9 Turtle on November 23, 2013, 05:30:44 PM
This was another deck that my friend gave me what do you people think?
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 05:31:09 PM
I would put {Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas} as well as {Tolarian Academy} for lawls.
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: 5/9 Turtle on November 23, 2013, 05:33:01 PM
Quote from: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 05:31:09 PM
I would put {Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas} as well as {Tolarian Academy} for lawls.
For lawls no because this deck can wreck
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 05:36:03 PM
Right, sorry. I figured it was a casual deck, as it's in the casual section.
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: 5/9 Turtle on November 23, 2013, 05:40:18 PM
Quote from: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 05:36:03 PM
Right, sorry. I figured it was a casual deck, as it's in the casual section.

Oh no it's perfectly fine, I just want to keep it this way because it was given to me and suggestions are welcome I just won't change anything, my bad I should have said that in the first post
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: socraticirony on November 23, 2013, 07:55:08 PM
The random {Mox Opal} intrigues me. Is it part of some sweet synergy I'm missing, or is your friend just awesome that way?

Edit: Lol, I read {Mox Opal} and thought {Mox Pearl}. They're both white stones, don't judge!
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 08:57:43 PM
So we can give suggestions, but regardless of what suggestions we make, you're not going to change anything?

That doesn't make sense to me. Why bother post it?
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on November 24, 2013, 03:03:21 AM
Quote from: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 08:57:43 PM
So we can give suggestions, but regardless of what suggestions we make, you're not going to change anything?

That doesn't make sense to me. Why bother post it?
Normally I'd agree with you but this is the casual section. Usually decks in here aren't meant to run at optimal levels. Also, this is a deck that was made by his friend Greg so he doesn't want to mess with it. But trust me, this deck defies all rules of Magic. Somehow Greg just makes decks run perfectly....
Title: Re: Blue Artifact
Post by: Ertai on November 24, 2013, 09:13:49 AM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on November 24, 2013, 03:03:21 AM
Quote from: Ertai on November 23, 2013, 08:57:43 PM
So we can give suggestions, but regardless of what suggestions we make, you're not going to change anything?

That doesn't make sense to me. Why bother post it?
Normally I'd agree with you but this is the casual section. Usually decks in here aren't meant to run at optimal levels. Also, this is a deck that was made by his friend Greg so he doesn't want to mess with it. But trust me, this deck defies all rules of Magic. Somehow Greg just makes decks run perfectly....

Oh I must have missed that. Haha
Text only | Text with Images