iMtG Server: Gathering

Gathering Forums => Ideas and Feedback => Topic started by: GColeG on October 27, 2013, 09:01:26 PM

Title: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: GColeG on October 27, 2013, 09:01:26 PM
Hi,
I did an import from my Deckbox collection. Loaded the .csv into iMTG via Dropbox.
Worked amazingly well, except:
Some cards loaded as the wrong edition; as far as I can tell, this only occurs when the original card was in Urza's Saga, Legacy, or Destiny, and when a later edition of the card is always available.
Any advice?
Thanks
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: Piotr on October 29, 2013, 06:16:37 AM
Give me a concrete example please?
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: GColeG on October 29, 2013, 08:25:28 PM
OK. Couldn't find a way to attach the entire files, but here's the first 6 records of the .csv from Deckbox:

Count,Tradelist Count,Name,Foil,Textless,Promo,Signed,Edition,Condition,Language
3,0,About Face,,,,,Urza's Legacy,Near Mint,English
1,0,Absolute Law,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abyssal Horror,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Academy Rector,,,,,Urza's Destiny,Near Mint,English
3,1,Academy Researchers,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Acidic Soil,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English

and here is the first 6 records of the resulting binder in iMTG (emailed)

Order,Expansion,ExpansionCode,CardName,CollectorNumber,Language,Count,Condition,IsFoil,IsSigned,Notes
0,"Urza's Legacy","ul","Repopulate",111,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Saga","us","Clear",7,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"7th Edition","7e","Impatience",197,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Destiny","ud","Private Research",41,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Destiny","ud","Iridescent Drake",35,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Magic 2013 (M13)","m13","Rewind",65,"en",2,0,0,0,""


As you can see, a couple of these switched editions; it seems to happen whenever there is a more recent edition to default to (i.e. not a unique card to Urza's).

Thanks,
        Cole
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: GColeG on October 29, 2013, 08:28:06 PM
Also, that sample was just a subset from the Urza's cycle. As far as I saw, the only expansions that changed started as one of the 3 Urza's cycle. All the other expansions seemed to import fine.
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: Piotr on October 30, 2013, 05:30:56 AM
Your example is not clear. What is your binders sorting?
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: GColeG on October 30, 2013, 12:09:28 PM
Crap. I screwed that up. I'll try later on when I'm back at my home machine. Meanwhile I found the Feedback button in the app so I sent you the specs.
Title: Re: expansion mix-ups just for Urza's Cycle
Post by: GColeG on October 30, 2013, 09:49:01 PM
OK. Starting over with a smaller test file.
I took the first 20 lines of the export from Deckbox (header + 19 entries), and saved it as "bugtest20.csv".
These are cards from various sets; only sort is alphabetical by card name. Here's the text of that file:

Count,Tradelist Count,Name,Foil,Textless,Promo,Signed,Edition,Condition,Language
1,0,Abandon Hope,,,,,Tempest,Near Mint,English
2,1,Abbey Gargoyles,,,,,Homelands,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abbey Gargoyles,,,,,Fifth Edition,Near Mint,English
5,0,Abbey Matron,,,,,Homelands,Near Mint,English
3,0,About Face,,,,,Urza's Legacy,Near Mint,English
1,0,Absolute Law,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Absorb,,,,,Invasion,Near Mint,English
2,1,Abu Ja'far,,,,,Chronicles,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abyssal Gatekeeper,,,,,Weatherlight,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abyssal Horror,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abyssal Hunter,,,,,Classic Sixth Edition,Near Mint,English
1,0,Abyssal Specter,,,,,Ice Age,Near Mint,English
1,0,Academy Rector,,,,,Urza's Destiny,Near Mint,English
3,1,Academy Researchers,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
1,0,Accumulated Knowledge,,,,,Nemesis,Near Mint,English
1,0,Acidic Soil,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
3,0,Acridian,,,,,Urza's Saga,Near Mint,English
7,0,Active Volcano,,,,,Chronicles,Near Mint,English
3,0,Adarkar Unicorn,,,,,Ice Age,Near Mint,English


I imported that to iMTG via Dropbox. Named the new binder "Bugtest20". Made no change to the sort.
The binder displays the cards in the same order, but now "Abyssal Horror" shows as 7th Edition, and  Academy Researchers shows as 10th Edition.

I emailed that binder to myself, and I've pasted the resulting .csv text here:

Order,Expansion,ExpansionCode,CardName,CollectorNumber,Language,Count,Condition,IsFoil,IsSigned,Notes
0,"Urza's Destiny","ud","Academy Rector",1,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Nemesis","ne","Accumulated Knowledge",26,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Chronicles","ch","Abu Ja'far",57,"en",2,0,0,0,""
0,"Invasion","in","Absorb",226,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Weatherlight","wl","Abyssal Gatekeeper",1,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Saga","us","Acidic Soil",172,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Legacy","ul","About Face",73,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"Ice Age","ia","Adarkar Unicorn",225,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"Homelands","hl","Abbey Gargoyles",101,"en",2,0,0,0,""
0,"Tempest","tp","Abandon Hope",1,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Chronicles","ch","Active Volcano",43,"en",7,0,0,0,""
0,"7th Edition","7e","Abyssal Horror",115,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Homelands","hl","Abbey Matron",103,"en",5,0,0,0,""
0,"Ice Age","ia","Abyssal Specter",1,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Classic Sixth Edition","6e","Abyssal Hunter",109,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Fifth Edition","5e","Abbey Gargoyles",277,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Saga","us","Acridian",230,"en",3,0,0,0,""
0,"Urza's Saga","us","Absolute Law",2,"en",1,0,0,0,""
0,"10th Edition","10e","Academy Researchers",63,"en",3,0,0,0,""

I have no idea why the order is different here from the way it's displayed in the binder view in iMTG (still alphabetical as imported). That's what tripped me up with my earlier post.
In any case, you can see the version changes to the 2 cards I mentioned.

I'll send a fresh help email from inside iMTG so you can see the backup versions.

Thanks
    GColeG