4 {Dragonskull Summit}
2 {Cavern of Souls}
2 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
7 {Swamp}
7 {Mountain}
22 lands
4 {Rakish Heir}
4 {Stromkirk Noble}
4 {Stormblood Berserker}
4 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
4 {Vexing Devil}
4 {Stromkirk Captain}
24 creatures
4 {Galvanic Blast}
4 {Shrine of Burning Rage}
4 {Brimstone Volley}
2 {Act of Treason}
14 other spells
Sideboard
|
Wanted to avoid any BB or RR cards
{Bloodline Keeper}?
I get the concern, but I think with the level o color fixing you shouldn't have a problem hitting two black by fourth or fifth turn. IMO.
Quote from: Wally on March 16, 2012, 07:09:02 PM
Quote from: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on March 16, 2012, 06:38:55 PM
{Bloodline Keeper}?
Did you even read what he wrote?
Yes, but he has a good mana base. He'll be able to play that with no prob.
Yeah I totally get that.
It makes sense that he stick more to the red side of the fence tho. I mean with all his other non-creature spells being red and running 4 shrines and 4 volts, I would think that to make the shrines most effective he would want a red in everything he played.
Pushing his mana to be more red biased.
To drop a 2 black spot creature might be tricky if he changes his mana that way..
Still a great card tho. :)
I agree that the mana base should be shifted more red, but as it stands, {Bloodline Keeper} is completely playable.
I have a playset of {bloodline keeper}s and it's easily one of my favorite cards. I just wanna see how this deck will run w/o him. Trying to run as few 4 drops as possible. I also want pretty much everything to have red to pump the shrine. Ofcourse if it doesn't pan out then there will be changes
Thanks for the comments.
Also, you have {Shrines of Burning Rage}, replace {Shock} with {Galvanic Blast}