iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Discussion => Topic started by: Imdowd80 on March 11, 2012, 07:33:54 PM

Title: Sharazard
Post by: Imdowd80 on March 11, 2012, 07:33:54 PM
This started in another thread, but how exactly does {Sharazard} work?
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: darkarts981 on March 11, 2012, 07:44:34 PM
I don't know, that is a really strange card!
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Rass on March 11, 2012, 07:53:46 PM
May want to post in rules section
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on March 11, 2012, 07:54:06 PM
It is quite strange...
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Coffee Vampire on March 11, 2012, 08:08:57 PM
I think it means that each player takes his or her remaining library and draws seven cards. Then they play a game of MtG with seperate graveyards and everything. Then after the game they shuffle their 2nd graveyards and their 2nd libraries and their 2nd hands together and keep on playing the main game, after doing any effects of losing the subgame.
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on March 11, 2012, 08:11:22 PM
What about a Karn?
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Coffee Vampire on March 11, 2012, 08:19:31 PM
Well, assuming I'm not wrong in my first post and assuming you are talking of {Karn Liberated}:

Karn would work as normal. If he was on the field, you would set him aside as well as your current hand and graveyard until the subgame is over. If you play him inside the subgame and use his ultimate, you restart the subgame, not the main game, because it says restart the game. So whatever game you are currently playing, you would restart it.
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: BlackJester on March 11, 2012, 08:22:28 PM
If you use Karn's ability in a {Shahrazad} sub-game, the fabric of the multiverse will be torn, destroying all universes as we know them. 🌃 Just don't do it!
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Coffee Vampire on March 11, 2012, 08:37:35 PM
LOL okay... xD but more importanly, don't tap land for mana. That REALLY screws things up!
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: BlackJester on March 11, 2012, 08:49:12 PM
I only tap {Forest}s for maple syrup. 🍂🍁You know, being a Canuck and all.
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: darkarts981 on March 11, 2012, 09:37:08 PM
Quote from: BlackJester on March 11, 2012, 08:49:12 PM
I only tap {Forest}s for maple syrup. 🍂🍁You know, being a Canuck and all.
Wow😂😜
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: ryannorris16 on March 11, 2012, 11:07:37 PM
INCEPTION
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Agrajagzz9 on March 12, 2012, 07:24:33 AM
This card is freaking hilarious I want to put one on a {panoptic mirror}.   In a group game...lol

Consistent win by rage quit
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: NillaWafers on March 12, 2012, 02:40:31 PM
Quote from: Agrajagzz9 on March 12, 2012, 07:24:33 AM
This card is freaking hilarious I want to put one on a {panoptic mirror}.   In a group game...lol

Consistent win by rage quit

That is when the blue deck deck goes and frantically searches for {Stifle} and puts it on a stick.
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: BlackJester on March 12, 2012, 02:59:50 PM
Quote from: NillaWafers on March 12, 2012, 02:40:31 PM
Quote from: Agrajagzz9 on March 12, 2012, 07:24:33 AM
This card is freaking hilarious I want to put one on a {panoptic mirror}.   In a group game...lol

Consistent win by rage quit

That is when the blue deck deck goes and frantically searches for {Stifle} and puts it on a stick.

XD  Too much work, just {Naturalize} the dang mirror.  Even a {Disperse} would do it!  It's currently only legal in Commander anyway.  :P
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: NillaWafers on March 12, 2012, 03:05:49 PM
{Sharazard} is yes, but luckily {Panoptic Mirror} isn't. That would be rather obnoxious.
Title: Re: Sharazard
Post by: Agrajagzz9 on March 12, 2012, 04:05:12 PM
I know but just in a casual game it would be very funny