Continuing off of Anubis and my convosation, I think
•Mortal Combat woman
•Lara Croft
•Cortana
•Dead Or Alive: Extreme Beach Volleyball woman.
are the most provocative video game characters.
Pikachu, Yellow Version
I see nothing sexually provocative. That is a foot down there you know!! 😉
Quote from: Mlerner12 on August 13, 2013, 11:26:13 PM
Continuing off of Anubis and my convosation, I think
•Mortal Combat woman
•Lara Croft
•Cortana
•Dead Or Alive: Extreme Beach Volleyball woman.
are the most provocative video game characters.
Don't forget some of the soul caliber women :P
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:28:20 PM
Pikachu, Yellow Version
^ this
And, no love for tomb raider, and strippers in duke nukem???
Late Croft IS tomb raider. And this is from my experience.
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:28:20 PM
Pikachu, Yellow Version
^ this
And, no love for tomb raider, and strippers in duke nukem???
Lara Croft was mentioned in the OP!
Umm, Pikachu is totes provocative.
Don't you remember his little sounds and jumping with hearts around his face? That's one sassy little electric mouse.
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:33:54 PM
Umm, Pikachu is totes provocative.
Don't you remember his little sounds and jumping with hearts around his face? That's one sassy little electric mouse.
SEXUALLY provocative.
Quote from: Mikefrompluto on August 13, 2013, 11:33:10 PM
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:28:20 PM
Pikachu, Yellow Version
^ this
And, no love for tomb raider, and strippers in duke nukem???
Lara Croft was mentioned in the OP!
I'm sorry, I'm oblivious.
Also, Harley Quinn in both Arkham Asylum, and Arkham City.
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:35:21 PM
Quote from: Mikefrompluto on August 13, 2013, 11:33:10 PM
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:28:20 PM
Pikachu, Yellow Version
^ this
And, no love for tomb raider, and strippers in duke nukem???
Lara Croft was mentioned in the OP!
I'm sorry, I'm oblivious.
Also, Harley Quinn in both Arkham Asylum, and Arkham City.
Hmm, never seen that.
Fine. Then the women from Injustice would be my second choice....
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:36:02 PM
Fine. Then the women from Injustice would be my second choice....
Yeah... Wonder Woman...
Speaking of which, Wonder Woman!
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:37:51 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:36:02 PM
Fine. Then the women from Injustice would be my second choice....
Yeah... Wonder Woman...
Speaking of which, Wonder Woman!
Why was she in a KIDS show???
So they could have Sex Ed. at an early age???
I dunno.
XD made my day.
Anubis isn't joining!!!!
Quote from: Mlerner12 on August 13, 2013, 11:38:23 PM
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on August 13, 2013, 11:37:51 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:36:02 PM
Fine. Then the women from Injustice would be my second choice....
Yeah... Wonder Woman...
Speaking of which, Wonder Woman!
Why was she in a KIDS show???
Same reason Spaceballs drops an F bomb and has a PG rating. People didn't know any better I suppose.
Wonder Woman is my jam. She's calling me for Halloween this year, unless Misty overturns my decision.
Misty. Always Misty.
Ooo, got some Misty love going. She's a go-to for sure.
I agree, go misty! You could pull that off easy
Harley quin 's ultimate on unjustifice is very painfull for men.. I mean who would want a bomb exploding in there balls...
I would have to say misty over Wonder Woman...though both choices are solid lol
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577631_10152675417100215_71680737_n.jpg
^previous Misty cosplay (in the preparation stage)
Quote from: Vampyvyrus on August 13, 2013, 11:48:02 PM
I would have to say misty over Wonder Woman...though both choices are solid lol
And I'd have to agree. I dig the crazy orange hair the most I think.
Hmm, always had a thing for ling xiaoyu from tekken. Um C.C. From code geass or yoko from gurren lagann.
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:49:50 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577631_10152675417100215_71680737_n.jpg
^previous Misty cosplay (in the preparation stage)
In this picture your face and hair look like my mom did when she was younger..cind of creepy:P
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 13, 2013, 11:53:42 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:49:50 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577631_10152675417100215_71680737_n.jpg
^previous Misty cosplay (in the preparation stage)
In this picture your face and hair look like my mom did when she was younger..cind of creepy:P
So I'm her younger doppelganger?! Word! That's awesome :) Like semi-time travel, lol.
Except she sadly never played mtg.. I've been trying to teach her but it has not gone so well...
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:55:08 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 13, 2013, 11:53:42 PM
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 13, 2013, 11:49:50 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577631_10152675417100215_71680737_n.jpg
^previous Misty cosplay (in the preparation stage)
In this picture your face and hair look like my mom did when she was younger..cind of creepy:P
So I'm her younger doppelganger?! Word! That's awesome :) Like semi-time travel, lol.
Just be sure not to meet her! We all know what happens when you meet your doppelgänger :D
Erm i don't^
Dude. Don't forget Femme Fatales from Lost Planet 2 and Girls from Soulcaliber
Stomach
[=O ]
Chest
[===============O ]
If you have played soul caliber^
LadyG after seeing that pic...you gotta be misty!! It's so BA. Maybe dye your hair?
Jessica rabbit
I did dye my hair that year, that picture was just at the halfway point of getting ready :)
Quote from: LadyGrixis on August 14, 2013, 08:21:11 AM
I did dye my hair that year, that picture was just at the halfway point of getting ready :)
Well I dig it. Most the women around here just pick something extremely slutty. I go to Halloween parties every year and now days most the girls dress up as "the girl next door" which for some reason is a tank top and boy shorts(underwear). Don't get me wrong it's fun to look at sometimes but not very creative.
What did you cosplay for, a con? @ ladygrixis
Uh I dunno about you but catherine and dragons crown is softcore porn
http://www.creativeuncut.com/art_dragons-crown_a.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=catherine+game+art&client=ms-android-att-us&source=android-browser-type&hl=en-US&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=JZILUvipNIe72AXnmoHgDA&ved=0CCsQsAQ&biw=360&bih=567&sei=LJILUuXJLaTCywHOg4HoBg
Yes, it was a Cosplay for MidSouth Con in Memphis, TN
Thats awesome I helped a couple of my friends by being a mule while they were going from photoshoot to photoshoot at otakon this weekend. I want to get more into cosplay
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on August 14, 2013, 10:20:54 AM
What did you cosplay for, a con? @ ladygrixis
Uh I dunno about you but catherine and dragons crown is softcore porn
http://www.creativeuncut.com/art_dragons-crown_a.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=catherine+game+art&client=ms-android-att-us&source=android-browser-type&hl=en-US&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=JZILUvipNIe72AXnmoHgDA&ved=0CCsQsAQ&biw=360&bih=567&sei=LJILUuXJLaTCywHOg4HoBg
SOFTcore?
As opposed to hardcore. Be careful on google image tho if you scroll to far you may run into rule 34
What is the game even about??????????????
http://m.gamespot.com/catherine/
Its actually a really good game
Since cosplaying has been brought up, has anyone seen The Dungeon Masters? It's a doc about people who cosplay their D&D characters and get way into it and go to LARPing cons and such. Good film.
I cosplayed as Phil "agent" Coulson from the avengers at Florida's Metrocon at the end of July, was really fun, took some pictures with several female loki's. Even got 2 captain Americas to sign my "vintage trading cards". And let's not forget accepting a couple of spidermen into the avengers and taking my business card back right before walking away :p. anywho, was loads of fun. Can't wait till next year :)
One day I'll change my prof picture. One day I'll cosplay joel from the last of us. Yup I have his wicked beard.
No I haven't heard of them, the larp group. Sound cool tho.
As for provocative characters, Mad Moxxi from Borderlands!
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on August 14, 2013, 11:20:19 PM
One day I'll change my prof picture. One day I'll cosplay joel from the last of us. Yup I have his wicked beard.
I will do this! ^
This topic is inappropriate for younger users and will teach them bad things for there age, therefor harming them. And harming is agaist imtg law.
._. Dude, come on. Live a little. (Or don't, we are talking video games here.)
Law is law.
No victim = no crime. I can read too y'know!
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
Not going to get into the debate but by that logic you could accuse the process of playing or refrence to card arts harmful.
I get what your trying to do but we should all not attempt to decide what's best for everyone else, that would stifle law. I would just make your claim to a mod and let them decide
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:06 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:58 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:06 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.
if nobody states that they were personally harmed by the ideas presented in this thread, there is no victim, thus, no crime has been committed.
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:01:34 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:58 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:06 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.
if nobody states that they were personally harmed by the ideas presented in this thread, there is no victim, thus, no crime has been committed.
The person does not have to state they are harmed they just have to be the victim
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:02:55 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:01:34 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:58 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:06 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.
if nobody states that they were personally harmed by the ideas presented in this thread, there is no victim, thus, no crime has been committed.
The person does not have to state they are harmed they just have to be the victim
by that logic, anything and everything that may possibly harm anyone, even if it does not, is a crime, correct?
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:03:58 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:02:55 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:01:34 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:58 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:57:06 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 09:48:11 PM
How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.
you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.
I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.
Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.
if nobody states that they were personally harmed by the ideas presented in this thread, there is no victim, thus, no crime has been committed.
The person does not have to state they are harmed they just have to be the victim
by that logic, anything and everything that may possibly harm anyone, even if it does not, is a crime, correct?
Maybe it is, therefor the imtg law needs rethinking.
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:06:13 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:09:10 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:06:13 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.
no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:12:19 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:09:10 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:06:13 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.
no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.
Maybe I am the victim to this.?
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:16:46 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:12:19 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:09:10 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:06:13 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.
no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.
Maybe I am the victim to this.?
,_, well sorry, gee, have you been murdered recently? No? Didn't think so, you are not a victim of this.
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:19:20 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:16:46 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:12:19 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:09:10 PM
Quote from: IceScythe on August 16, 2013, 10:06:13 PM
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible
but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.
With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.
no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.
Maybe I am the victim to this.?
,_, well sorry, gee, have you been murdered recently? No? Didn't think so, you are not a victim of this.
I ment victim of this thread
Well, are you? Yes or no?
No, I give to sorry.
If your offended by this topic why are you in here?¿?
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 10:26:03 PM
No, I give to sorry.
Sorry about ranting. I just kind of lost it when I lost 10 karma from 15 to 5
To end this argument. To all younger ones:
Every other person on this planet is a human being with thoughts, feelings, and desires just like you. It is ok to admire someone's beauty, but keep in mind that they are a human being too. And so should be treated like you would want to be treated. Keep a balance between the two
Happy?
....ffs
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 16, 2013, 10:27:26 PM
To end this argument. To all younger ones:
Every other person on this planet is a human being with thoughts, feelings, and desires just like you. It is ok to admire someone's beauty, but keep in mind that they are a human being too. And so should be treated like you would want to be treated.
Happy?
happy, now lets all settle down over a pint, shall we?
And here I thought this was going to get interesting enough for a big trial debate XD, anyway, back to subject, mortal kombat fo sho, and Samus Aran!
Dead or alive.. anyone?
In all fairness to the thread, it does say PROVOCATIVE in the title. It is implied that it is for people with mature mindsets. There was a fair warning before you even opened the thread.
Complaining about this thread being offensive to younger members is the same as going to a porn site and saying the same thing.
Which is illegal btw, lol
The ladies in Killer Instinct...
Quote from: Pslider on August 16, 2013, 10:38:45 PM
The ladies in Killer Instinct...
aww yeah, I remember that game! KI Gold! That jungle chick, and the other one with the batons.
Quote from: Mikefrompluto on August 16, 2013, 10:35:57 PM
In all fairness to the thread, it does say PROVOCATIVE in the title. It is implied that it is for people with mature mindsets. There was a fair warning before you even opened the thread.
Complaining about this thread being offensive to younger members is the same as going to a porn site and saying the same thing.
This may sound really stupid but, I have no problem with this i was just practicing my non profit part time job as a lawyer or judge or watever as settling disputes in videos games.
I want to be a lawyer when I grow up except one that does not help people who do bad things. Well my last name is Lawson not kidding:P
Quote from: Hunteroffire9 on August 16, 2013, 11:00:15 PM
I want to be a lawyer when I grow up except one that does not help people who do bad things. Well my last name is Lawson not kidding:P
meaning you would rather be a prosecutor than a defendant.
Well he wouldn't be a defendant, unless he was the one on trial lol he'd be a defense attorney.
Quote from: EvACiDe on August 17, 2013, 01:36:02 AM
Well he wouldn't be a defendant, unless he was the one on trial lol he'd be a defense attorney.
yes, lol, pardon my stupid
Most women (if not all women) in duke nukem games hands down
Lulu from FFX had amazing...tracts of land....
LOL +1 for the Monty Python reference?
Ms PAC man is provocative. She eats and eats and still manages to maintain her figure. And I promise you that no video game character is as curvy as she. Plus she hasn't aged a day in over 30 years. She does everything a man can do only better. Why don't more people cosplay the Ms?
Quote from: Langku on August 17, 2013, 11:17:27 PM
Ms PAC man is provocative. She eats and eats and still manages to maintain her figure. And I promise you that no video game character is as curvy as she. Plus she hasn't aged a day in over 30 years. She does everything a man can do only better. Why don't more people cosplay the Ms?
Lets not mention how many balls she gobbles up a day...
0_0
This is taking a weirder turn that I though...
Quote from: Mlerner12 on August 18, 2013, 12:38:17 AM
0_0
This is taking a weirder turn that I though...
Welcome to people salivating over virtual coding. It's gonna get weird regardless! :)
Grand theft auto "hot coffee mode"
Lolipop chainsaw anyone?
God of war minigames....
Rikku in FFX-2 has some thong exposure going on and I LOVE IT.
Samus Aran
Nabooru