iMtG Server: Gathering

Gathering Forums => Ideas and Feedback => Topic started by: Birdbrain on July 24, 2013, 06:03:01 PM

Title: Search suggestion
Post by: Birdbrain on July 24, 2013, 06:03:01 PM
Some how allowing you to search by evergreen mechanics?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 24, 2013, 06:40:24 PM
Hmm?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Gorzo on July 25, 2013, 06:01:17 AM
I think he means adding a drop-down menu in the search filter perimeters (where you already have things like card type, set/expansion, power, toughness, etc) that would include the common keyword mechanics.

Not a bad idea, actually. Would be nice to filter by Deathtouch or lifelink for example, without having to type it in via filter by text (and would also keep the search text box free for further filtering). A small convenience, but would be convenient nonetheless.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 25, 2013, 08:39:37 AM
Not a bad idea.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Birdbrain on July 25, 2013, 12:51:43 PM
I'm just tried of typing a keyword in the search box and getting things that give creatures the keyword, rather than things with the keyword on them already
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Langku on July 25, 2013, 01:03:33 PM
Ooooh. Yeah. Bird, Gorzo and Piotr, super keen idea.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 25, 2013, 05:13:56 PM
Who's idea is this? Can I use it when developing iMtG? According to iMtG law, please?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Gorzo on July 25, 2013, 07:35:26 PM
I would say it was Bird's idea. I only articulated ;)
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 25, 2013, 07:39:42 PM
Can I be prevented from having the same idea when developing iMtG? According to iMtG law, please?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Mikefrompluto on July 25, 2013, 07:46:42 PM
I would say no. People wouldn't post in a section called "Ideas and Feedback" if they didnt want their ideas implemented (doing to them what they wouldn't want done to them.)
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 25, 2013, 07:54:12 PM
What if they changed their mind?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Mikefrompluto on July 25, 2013, 07:58:23 PM
They shouldn't have suggested it in the first place hahah. I really don't know in that case.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 25, 2013, 08:03:17 PM
Assuming you were right in the first case, I would say that in second the 'agreements must be kept' applies. Posting here is with the assumption that your idea will become part of iMtG, by posting here you agreed to that. You offered your idea. True or false?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Mikefrompluto on July 25, 2013, 08:08:12 PM
That would be true.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Langku on July 27, 2013, 05:59:12 PM
I run tribal decks a good 80% of the time. I realize it may be a niche idea but I would love a similar menu for card types (particularly for creatures in my case) but  legendary, arcane, tribal, etc would be useful for me too. The current "types" button has kept me happy but an alphabetized check off menu would be one less thing for my lazy fingers to type. It would also be a fun way to look at what card types exist and perhaps gain inspiration for my next tribal deck.

I realize a types drop down menu would be ... extensive. Are there other drawbacks to such a function?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on July 27, 2013, 06:51:40 PM
Sounds doable.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on July 30, 2013, 10:52:29 PM
Mtgdeckbuilder.com allows you a lot of search parameters, might be a good model.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: TheRagingMage on July 31, 2013, 12:47:44 PM
What about being able to put stuff in the search box or in the selections for types, expansions, and things like that, and have stuff that fills those criteria not show up?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Imink on July 31, 2013, 12:54:40 PM
I'd like to see something like this implemented
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Birdbrain on August 01, 2013, 12:52:31 PM
I realy don't care whether you use my idea or not. Though it would make things easier for searches
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on August 01, 2013, 02:21:28 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 01, 2013, 12:52:31 PM
I realy don't care whether you use my idea or not.

I don't believe that. Why else would you put your idea forward?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: The1337Magician on August 01, 2013, 05:29:17 PM
By the way, could you get rid of the type "Ongoing" in the type menu. Ongoing is a Planar card type and not a regular card type.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 08:53:46 AM
Quote from: Piotr on August 01, 2013, 02:21:28 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 01, 2013, 12:52:31 PM
I realy don't care whether you use my idea or not.

I don't believe that. Why else would you put your idea forward?
i posted the idea with the possibility that you might use it, yet accepting the fact that you might not. Also, you were making it sound like I would make a big deal if you used it, so I was letting you know I wouldn't.
Here is another suggestion. Sense the big scandel with my contest happened. I'd like to see mod only pulls for contest holders that want to use them
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on August 02, 2013, 09:30:56 AM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 08:53:46 AMI'd like to see mod only pulls for contest holders that want to use them

I'm not sure what do you mean by that?
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 11:55:40 AM
Quote from: Piotr on August 02, 2013, 09:30:56 AM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 08:53:46 AMI'd like to see mod only pulls for contest holders that want to use them

I'm not sure what do you mean by that?
a pull were only mods can vote. That way, people don't make a million accounts and vote for themselves a million times
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Piotr on August 02, 2013, 12:03:31 PM
Democracy is so stupidly useless when it comes to making decisions. Truth is true regardless of the number of people voting for or against it. Polls are fun way to get people's opinions, but never ever tie any meaningful decision to a popular vote. Use your brains instead.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Mikefrompluto on August 02, 2013, 12:31:47 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 11:55:40 AM
Quote from: Piotr on August 02, 2013, 09:30:56 AM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 08:53:46 AMI'd like to see mod only pulls for contest holders that want to use them

I'm not sure what do you mean by that?
a pull were only mods can vote. That way, people don't make a million accounts and vote for themselves a million times

I think I may have a better idea that won't cause a sense of obligation for the mods here. If youre bent on not using polls, instead you can take a list of people who would be willing to be a judge in any future contests. When it comes time for judges to be needed, assign those people a number and choose randomly. Sort of like a jury system. You can even keep the information private so people don't try to bribe judges.

To take care of people voting for themselves, either they can't be eligible to vote, or you make it a rule where they can't vote for themselves.
Title: Re: Search suggestion
Post by: Anoobass on August 05, 2013, 12:40:41 AM
Quote from: Mikefrompluto on August 02, 2013, 12:31:47 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 11:55:40 AM
Quote from: Piotr on August 02, 2013, 09:30:56 AM
Quote from: Birdbrain on August 02, 2013, 08:53:46 AMI'd like to see mod only pulls for contest holders that want to use them

I'm not sure what do you mean by that?
a pull were only mods can vote. That way, people don't make a million accounts and vote for themselves a million times

I think I may have a better idea that won't cause a sense of obligation for the mods here. If youre bent on not using polls, instead you can take a list of people who would be willing to be a judge in any future contests. When it comes time for judges to be needed, assign those people a number and choose randomly. Sort of like a jury system. You can even keep the information private so people don't try to bribe judges.

To take care of people voting for themselves, either they can't be eligible to vote, or you make it a rule where they can't vote for themselves.

I like this idea, if it is implemented, I would go to this, so called, "jury duty"