Text only | Text with Images

iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: Sammastin on March 04, 2012, 12:57:29 PM

Title: Vampire
Post by: Sammastin on March 04, 2012, 12:57:29 PM

Vampire

75 cards, 15 sideboard


9 {Mountain}
2 {Dragonskull Summit}
9 {Swamp}
20 lands


4 {Stromkirk Captain}
2 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
4 {Stromkirk Noble}
4 {Rakish Heir}
4 {Vampire Interloper}
3 {Bloodline Keeper}
2 {Markov Blademaster}
23 creatures


3 {Geth's Verdict}
1 {Sword of War and Peace}
2 {Gut Shot}
2 {Curse of Death's Hold}
1 {Curse of Thirst}
3 {Curse of Misfortunes}
1 {Curse of Bloodletting}
4 {Tragic Slip}
17 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Black Sun's Zenith}
4 {Bloodcrazed Neonate}
1 {Curse of the Pierced Heart}
1 {Curse of Stalked Prey}
2 {Vampiric Fury}
2 {Runechanter's Pike}
3 {Sever the Bloodline}
15 sideboard cards


Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: loop-s-pool on March 04, 2012, 01:02:32 PM
BR vamps is the way to go. No doubt.
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: cltrn81 on March 05, 2012, 12:25:15 PM
Quote from: loop-s-pool on March 04, 2012, 01:02:32 PM
BR vamps is the way to go. No doubt.

I agree....mono black vamps would be feasable if {vampire Nocturnus} was still standard.......I still can't bring myself to take my mono black vamp deck apart.
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: Sammastin on March 17, 2012, 01:18:08 PM
Updated
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: TBNL on March 17, 2012, 01:32:00 PM
{Olivia Voldaren}?
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: Sammastin on March 18, 2012, 05:16:30 PM
Dont have one
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on March 18, 2012, 05:29:19 PM
The only thing I suggest is adding more BR dual lands and droping the curses for more burn/kill spells.
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: Sammastin on March 23, 2012, 09:10:26 PM
In keeping the curses as a sort of backup plan. As for the dual lands, I only have what I got. Also missing 3 noble as of now.
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: Clint9119 on March 24, 2012, 03:50:12 AM
Vampires are aggressive.. Curses tend to be a little slower.. And if you really like the curse version you can use bitterheart witches and fiend of shadows.. Also if your looking for Olivias I have 2 for trade ...also could someone please explain to me the use of aristocrat? Seems very sub par to me
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: BlackJester on March 24, 2012, 11:52:43 AM
Quote from: Clint9119 on March 24, 2012, 03:50:12 AM
Vampires are aggressive.. Curses tend to be a little slower.. And if you really like the curse version you can use bitterheart witches and fiend of shadows.. Also if your looking for Olivias I have 2 for trade ...also could someone please explain to me the use of aristocrat? Seems very sub par to me
I agree with this for the most part, but it think {Curse of the Pierced Heart} is great for triggering Bloodthirst vampires.
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: TBNL on March 24, 2012, 12:10:25 PM
Quote from: BlackJester on March 24, 2012, 11:52:43 AM
Quote from: Clint9119 on March 24, 2012, 03:50:12 AM
Vampires are aggressive.. Curses tend to be a little slower.. And if you really like the curse version you can use bitterheart witches and fiend of shadows.. Also if your looking for Olivias I have 2 for trade ...also could someone please explain to me the use of aristocrat? Seems very sub par to me
I agree with this for the most part, but it think {Curse of the Pierced Heart} is great for triggering Bloodthirst vampires.
If he had Bloodthirst in the deck...
Title: Re: Vampire
Post by: BlackJester on March 24, 2012, 12:36:10 PM
Yeah, I was just generalizing. 😌
Text only | Text with Images