iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 05:49:56 PM

Title: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 05:49:56 PM

Dark Naya: PTQ Canton

38 cards, 6 sideboard


3 {Arbor Elf}
4 {Huntmaster of the Fells}
1 {Zealous Conscripts}
1 {Blood Baron of Vizkopa}
2 {Sin Collector}
2 {Olivia Voldaren}
2 {Dryad Militant}
3 {Fiend Hunter}
3 {Acidic Slime}
2 {Deadbridge Goliath}

23 creatures


1 {Mizzium Mortars}
1 {Blind Obedience}
1 {Sever the Bloodline}
1 {Putrefy}
2 {Selesnya Charm}
3 {Farseek}

9 other spells


Sideboard

1 {Sin Collector}
3 {Centaur Healer}
2 {Slaughter Games}

6 sideboard cards



Notes:
Need help finishing this deck for Saturday. Every and all tips welcome!!
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Silent1236 on June 18, 2013, 07:09:32 PM
I wanna say 1 less {Farseek}, {Slaughter Games} pushed to SB, and 1 more {Acidic Slime}.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 07:16:39 PM
Quote from: Silent1236 on June 18, 2013, 07:09:32 PM
I wanna say 1 less {Farseek}, {Slaughter Games} pushed to SB, and 1 more {Acidic Slime}.


Ok sounds good :)
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 07:35:02 PM
Nooooo lol. I don't want that same old boring thragtusk resto angel combo. Too mainstream lol
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 08:02:26 PM
Updated. Still need more cards lol
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on June 18, 2013, 08:21:11 PM
I've heard lands were good, lol
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Wally on June 18, 2013, 08:28:12 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on June 18, 2013, 08:21:11 PM
I've heard lands were good, lol

Yes! Lands will make a huge difference with this deck!

Also I would look at adding more removals.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 08:36:06 PM
I haven't  started land base yet
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Silent1236 on June 18, 2013, 08:45:58 PM
-2 {Deadbridge Goliath}
-1 {Sever the Bloodline}

+2 {Blood Baron of Vizkopa} (or {Thragtusk}, since, ya know, he's good)
+1 {Mizzium Mortars}
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on June 18, 2013, 09:04:45 PM
This deck seems too inconsistent. You should drop some 1-2 ofs and make more 3-4 ofs. Also, {Sire of Insanity}, because he's the bee's knees.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: iTzTowelie404 on June 18, 2013, 09:11:46 PM
Sire is a fantastic anti control card.  Honestly, if u are takin this to a PTQ, u NEED Thraggy's.  all four of em
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 09:16:09 PM
Just tried the full deck out. It works beautifully! Lol will post the rest later
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Wally on June 18, 2013, 10:13:09 PM
Personally, I would recommend about 40-50 games against various decks before I would consider it ready for a ptq. That may equate to around 30 hours of deck time, including building and tweaking. At least that's the kind of expectations I would expect from my own deck and probably my competitors.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 10:20:30 PM
Will do lol
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 10:29:57 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 18, 2013, 10:28:19 PM
Still goin 4 colors?  Ugh...  Good luck.


It's called dark naya for a reason ;) lol but it ran really well in practice.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 18, 2013, 10:45:51 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 18, 2013, 10:32:21 PM
Why not add in blue, run a ton of mana ramp and play {door to nothingness}. 

You will get mana screwed a lot more often if you are running 4 colors. 

Btw, when should I expect my vendilion clique and temple gardens?


I have no idea lol. And nah I feel safe with this deck. Tried it for the past 5 hours an been fixing mana. Seems to work really well and love that it feels control but has an aggro build with it. Like playing 1 and 2 drops but have removal and graveyard removal is great!
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Silent1236 on June 18, 2013, 10:50:37 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on June 18, 2013, 09:04:45 PM
This deck seems too inconsistent. You should drop some 1-2 ofs and make more 3-4 ofs.

^^
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Leevai420 on June 18, 2013, 11:20:35 PM
Canton baby!! Right in my back yard :)
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Mattao19 on June 19, 2013, 04:36:11 PM
 {Burning-Tree Emissary}?
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 19, 2013, 11:15:30 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 19, 2013, 04:36:11 PM
{Burning-Tree Emissary}?

I was def. thinking about her but sadly she didn't make the cut :/
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Mattao19 on June 19, 2013, 11:25:41 PM
Quote from: All-Mana Mania on June 19, 2013, 11:15:30 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 19, 2013, 04:36:11 PM
{Burning-Tree Emissary}?

I was def. thinking about her but sadly she didn't make the cut :/

But she's so good!! Lol it's a free creature and that's always good. But I can def. see why you don't need her. Just thought I'd give my 10ยข
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: All-Mana Mania on June 20, 2013, 10:38:29 AM
Yea I ment to post deck list last night -.- but forgot so imma post it later today. Already have my gameplans and fille out the deck sheet :) I'm ready lol
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Hunteroffire9 on June 22, 2013, 11:02:41 AM
Interested to see how you do.
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Hunteroffire9 on June 23, 2013, 10:22:03 AM
How did it do???
Title: Re: Dark Naya: PTQ Canton
Post by: Slenderbro on June 23, 2013, 03:19:05 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 18, 2013, 07:33:44 PM
That deck has green.  It needs 4 {thragtusk}.

And I would take out the white.  4 colors is hard to run.
Just because it has green doesnt mean that it needs thrags. And without white you cant call this dark naya, it would just be jund.