iMtG Server: Gathering

Too Much Life 64 cards, 4 sideboard 4 {Woodland Cemetery} 4 {Sunpetal Grove} 4 {Godless Shrine} 4 {Overgrown Tomb} 4 {Temple Garden} 4 {Isolated Chapel} 24 lands 4 {Blood Baron of Vizkopa} 3 {Armada Wurm} 4 {Rhox Faithmender} 3 {Trostani, Selesnya's Voice} 4 {Thragtusk} 18 creatures 2 {Chalice of Life} 2 {Tablet of the Guilds} 2 {Conjurer's Closet} 1 {Garruk, Primal Hunter} 4 {Advent of the Wurm} 4 {Gift of Orzhova} 3 {Ultimate Price} 18 other spells Sideboard 2 {Blind Obedience} 2 {Golgari Charm} 4 sideboard cards Notes: Any suggestions are definitely appreciated. This is a home brew that I want to see if I can make competitive.

I think you'd be better off make it a tad bit more creature based.

Add in {Cathedral Sanctifier},  {Centaur Healer}, and  {Restoration Angel}. That way you get the 3 life from them and have some chump blockers, not much early game here.

Quote from: Monrodesign on May 09, 2013, 01:45:08 PM
I think you'd be better off make it a tad bit more creature based.

Add in {Cathedral Sanctifier},  {Centaur Healer}, and  {Restoration Angel}. That way you get the 3 life from them and have some chump blockers, not much early game here.

Take out  {Garruk, Primal Hunter},  {Tablet of the Guilds}, and 2  {Advent of the Wurm}, sideboard the  {Ultimate Price}?  Run four  {Cathedral Sanctifier} and four  {Restoration Angel}??

Quote from: Jlamb5 on May 09, 2013, 01:14:50 PM

Too Much Life 64 cards, 4 sideboard 4 {Woodland Cemetery} 4 {Sunpetal Grove} 4 {Godless Shrine} 4 {Overgrown Tomb} 4 {Temple Garden} 4 {Isolated Chapel} 24 lands 2 {Blood Baron of Vizkopa} 1 {Armada Wurm} 3 {Rhox Faithmender} 2 {Trostani, Selesnya's Voice} 4 {Thragtusk} 18 creatures 2 {Chalice of Life} 1 {Conjurer's Closet} 2 {Garruk, Primal Hunter} 3 {Advent of the Wurm} 2 {Gift of Orzhova} 3 {Ultimate Price}

3 {Restoration Angel}
4 {Cathedral Sanctifier}
2 {Centaur Healer}[/td][/tr][/table]

Pretty much play garruk after you have a Thragtusk down, sac him to draw 5 cards, but I like the idea.

 {Heroes' Reunion}?

I would have said this deck had no protection against aggro, but people seem to have already fixed that.