iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Discussion => Topic started by: Bman0121 on May 06, 2013, 11:19:57 AM

Title: I dont understand!
Post by: Bman0121 on May 06, 2013, 11:19:57 AM
Why is  {Glimpse of Nature} still 20 bucks it is banned in modern and it hade a suedo reprint  {Beck // Call} which for 1 more mana is better than  {Glimpse of Nature} but  {Beck // Call} is only 2 to 3 bucks do you guys think it will get to be 20 bucks like  {Glimpse of Nature}?
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Mikefrompluto on May 06, 2013, 11:20:51 AM
http://imtgapp.com/forum/index.php?topic=15535.0#top
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Bman0121 on May 06, 2013, 12:02:39 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on May 06, 2013, 11:28:07 AM
2 colour, 2 mana spell is not even close to the same thing as a 1 mana 1 colour spell, even if their abilities are the same.
Is  {Searing Spear} the same as a  {Lightning Bolt}?  {Searing Spear} doesn't even have an off colour as its extra casing cost, it's got a colourless.
Very true +1 from me
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Silent1236 on May 06, 2013, 12:57:48 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on May 06, 2013, 12:55:20 PM
This is just like {Victim of Night} and {Thoughtseize}. Victim is better in every way...but cost 2 colorless more. 2 colorless makes a $60 difference!

They do totally different things though.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Dudecore on May 06, 2013, 01:02:57 PM
Quote from: Silent1236 on May 06, 2013, 12:57:48 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on May 06, 2013, 12:55:20 PM
This is just like {Victim of Night} and {Thoughtseize}. Victim is better in every way...but cost 2 colorless more. 2 colorless makes a $60 difference!

They do totally different things though.

They're similar in a round about way. You're removing the threat before you have to use removal on it.

{Thoughtseize} is dramatically better in nearly every single way though.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Bman0121 on May 06, 2013, 01:06:30 PM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 06, 2013, 01:02:57 PM
Quote from: Silent1236 on May 06, 2013, 12:57:48 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on May 06, 2013, 12:55:20 PM
This is just like {Victim of Night} and {Thoughtseize}. Victim is better in every way...but cost 2 colorless more. 2 colorless makes a $60 difference!

They do totally different things though.
They're similar in a round about way. You're removing the threat before you have to use removal on it.

{Thoughtseize} is dramatically better in nearly every single way though.
Or he might have been talking about  {Distress}
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Dudecore on May 06, 2013, 01:09:20 PM
I don't think meant {Victim of the Night} however, perhaps {Coercion}? It is 2 colorless more, and hits everything unlike {Thoughtseize}
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Dudecore on May 06, 2013, 01:21:53 PM
Paying that much for a {Duress} effect is pretty bad, it's why it doesn't see play vs. {Thoughtseize}. While better, it doesn't do enough, especially when you need it.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Bman0121 on May 06, 2013, 03:38:07 PM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 06, 2013, 01:21:53 PM
Paying that much for a {Duress} effect is pretty bad, it's why it doesn't see play vs. {Thoughtseize}. While better, it doesn't do enough, especially when you need it.
{Thoughtseize} is waayyyyyyy to much money!
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 05:40:42 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on May 06, 2013, 11:28:07 AM
2 colour, 2 mana spell is not even close to the same thing as a 1 mana 1 colour spell, even if their abilities are the same.
Is  {Searing Spear} the same as a  {Lightning Bolt}?  {Searing Spear} doesn't even have an off colour as its extra casing cost, it's got a colourless.
{searing spear} is actually good in a burn deck if you want to cram more burn in. Would you rather have 4 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage? Or 8 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage?
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Xaol on May 06, 2013, 06:34:27 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 05:40:42 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on May 06, 2013, 11:28:07 AM
2 colour, 2 mana spell is not even close to the same thing as a 1 mana 1 colour spell, even if their abilities are the same.
Is  {Searing Spear} the same as a  {Lightning Bolt}?  {Searing Spear} doesn't even have an off colour as its extra casing cost, it's got a colourless.
{searing spear} is actually good in a burn deck if you want to cram more burn in. Would you rather have 4 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage? Or 8 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage?
Yes, but {Lightning Bolt} > {Searing Spear} any day.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 06:36:44 PM
Quote from: Xaol on May 06, 2013, 06:34:27 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 05:40:42 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on May 06, 2013, 11:28:07 AM
2 colour, 2 mana spell is not even close to the same thing as a 1 mana 1 colour spell, even if their abilities are the same.
Is  {Searing Spear} the same as a  {Lightning Bolt}?  {Searing Spear} doesn't even have an off colour as its extra casing cost, it's got a colourless.
{searing spear} is actually good in a burn deck if you want to cram more burn in. Would you rather have 4 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage? Or 8 cheap costed cards that do 3 damage?
Yes, but {Lightning Bolt} > {Searing Spear} any day.
this is true. I'm just pointing out {searing spear} is useful. Though only in a deck that already has {lightning bolt} and is wanting to push more early burn
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: adventus on May 06, 2013, 06:56:03 PM
This is like comparing a $10 bill and a $20 bill.  Sure, they're both useful, but one is MORE useful.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Vyse on May 06, 2013, 06:56:51 PM
I think I like that explanation the best
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 06:58:44 PM
Quote from: adventus on May 06, 2013, 06:56:03 PM
This is like comparing a $10 bill and a $20 bill.  Sure, they're both useful, but one is MORE useful.
so you'd rather have a 20$ bill than a 20$ bill AND a 10$ bill?
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: MisterJH on May 06, 2013, 07:03:13 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 06:58:44 PM
Quote from: adventus on May 06, 2013, 06:56:03 PM
This is like comparing a $10 bill and a $20 bill.  Sure, they're both useful, but one is MORE useful.
so you'd rather have a 20$ bill than a 20$ bill AND a 10$ bill?
Irrelevant, thats not the argument
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 07:05:07 PM
It is too relevant. Having 8 cheap burn spells that deal 3 is better than only having 4 cheap burn spells that do 3. At least in a burn deck
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Kagain123 on May 06, 2013, 07:09:45 PM
My 2 cents: take  {Black Lotus} and  {Lion's Eye Diamond}. Which is better? Or  {City of Traitors} and  {Lotus Vale}? How about  {Mox Opal} and  {Mox Diamond}? A lot of factors go into which card is better or worse, mana cost, banned list, current meta etc.

{Glimpse of Nature} is still $20 while  {Beck // Call} is $3 is likely due to DGM just released on 5/3/2013. Glimpse is massively used for legacy Elves. No major tourneys have been run in legacy or modern yet so we can't see what prices will change and where.
Title: Re: I dont understand!
Post by: Birdbrain on May 06, 2013, 07:13:44 PM
Lions eye diamond is better than black lotus. It has more uses at the vary least