iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Rules => Topic started by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on February 20, 2012, 12:00:43 PM

Title: This is kind of stupid
Post by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on February 20, 2012, 12:00:43 PM
Ok
I summon vorinclex. My opponent act of treasons it. I cancel, but he uses fiery fall, sacs it, and gets three mana. Can he do that?
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: cltrn81 on February 20, 2012, 12:06:30 PM
If he legally takes control of your creature, he can sac it.  I use {act of treason} and {fling} in a deck I have.  I then say thank you for your creature, he attacks you, then I fling him in yo face, and I sum it all up with a closing argument of BOOYA!!!
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on February 20, 2012, 12:09:23 PM
Ok
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: BlackJester on February 20, 2012, 12:27:02 PM
Quote from: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on February 20, 2012, 12:00:43 PM
Ok
I summon vorinclex. My opponent act of treasons it. I cancel, but he uses fiery fall, sacs it, and gets three mana. Can he do that?
Let's get some links here:
{Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger}
{Act of Treason}
{Cancel}
{Fiery Fall}

If you Cancel his Act of Treason, he won't have control of Vorinclex to sac it for anything. The Act is still waiting to resolve.
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: BlackJester on February 20, 2012, 12:40:09 PM
Also, I think you meant {Infernal Plunge} instead of {Fiery Fall} (Infernal=Fiery, Fall=Plunge ðŸ˜,), and since the plunge is a Sorcery, your friend couldn't have cast it in response to anything. He needs a slap in the face with the Rule Book. 😱
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on February 20, 2012, 01:00:11 PM
Ok cool! I have a rule book I can spare......
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: Chaosquirrel on February 20, 2012, 02:58:32 PM
But if he {cancel}ed {act of treason} his opponent never gained control of his creature to sac it. Or did I read the scenerio wrong?
Title: Re: This is kind of stupid
Post by: cltrn81 on February 20, 2012, 03:07:04 PM
Right...he never gained control to sac.  That is why I said "if he legally gained" control then he could sac.  I thought the question pertained to sacing someone's creature if you gained control temporarily.