iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Rules => Topic started by: Jlamb5 on April 04, 2013, 07:46:59 PM

Title: Goblin Electromancer, Bonfire of the Damned
Post by: Jlamb5 on April 04, 2013, 07:46:59 PM
Does  {Goblin Electromancer} reduce the (X) cost for  {Bonfire of the Damned}? I tea the ruling that it does decrease ALTERNATE costs, but the ruling stated specifically overload so I'm unsure if it works here.
Title: Re: Goblin Electromancer, Bonfire of the Damned
Post by: adventus on April 04, 2013, 08:13:33 PM
Yes x costs are 1 less too

RESOLVED
Title: Re: Goblin Electromancer, Bonfire of the Damned
Post by: Mentonin on April 04, 2013, 10:56:33 PM
The x is the actual cost, not alternate. Alternate costs are the ones which give you the option to pay for the card which is not the top-right mana cost
Title: Re: Goblin Electromancer, Bonfire of the Damned
Post by: Pleeb on April 06, 2013, 02:16:54 AM
Quote from: Jlamb5 on April 04, 2013, 07:46:59 PM
Does  {Goblin Electromancer} reduce the (X) cost for  {Bonfire of the Damned}? I tea the ruling that it does decrease ALTERNATE costs, but the ruling stated specifically overload so I'm unsure if it works here.

The goblins reduce the casting cost by 1. The proper way to cast bonfire is to declair X. If in this case you want X to be 4, then you would end up paying 7R for the spell. R  + X + X - 1