iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 01:38:22 PM

Title: Red bant need sideboard help
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 01:38:22 PM
4  {Abundant Growth}
3  {Rest in Peace}
4  {Blind Obedience}
2  {Detention Sphere}
1  {Oblivion Ring}
3  {Sphere of Safety}
3  {Assemble the Legion}
1  {Mana Bloom}

4  {Thragtusk}
1  {Angel of Serenity}
3  {Farseek}
4  {Supreme Verdict}

2  {Sphinx's Revelation}
1  {Aurelia's Fury}

4  {Breeding Pool}
2  {Hinterland Harbor}
4  {Temple Garden}
2  {Sunpetal Grove}
3  {Hallowed Fountain}
2  {Glacial Fortress}
2  {Clifftop Retreat}
1  {Sulfur Falls}
1  {Stomping Ground}
1  {Plains}
2  {Forest}

Sideboard
2  {Garruk, Primal Hunter}
3  {Rhox Faithmender}
4  {Pacifism}
1  {Rest in Peace}
2  {Ground Seal}
3  {Nevermore}

This is my rl deck i dont really like net decks so i brewed a bant enchantment deck using  {Sphere of Safety} instead of the usual  {Ethereal Armor} and added red it runs well but my sideboard is sketchy and im not to sure if   {Aurelia's Fury} is as good as everyone says
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:17:59 PM
Without {snapcaster mage} and ramp together {aurelia's fury} just doesnt keep up. Ill bump my 5 color control, it has a similar base to this.
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 02:22:41 PM
Quote from: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:17:59 PM
Without {snapcaster mage} and ramp together {aurelia's fury} just doesnt keep up. Ill bump my 5 color control, it has a similar base to this.
{Snapcaster Mage}
Isnt too good with  {Rest in Peace}
What should i replace  {Aurelia's Fury} with? Another  {Sphinx's Revelation}?
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:24:00 PM
Yes
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 02:33:28 PM
Quote from: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:24:00 PM
Yes
I only run 3, 3 mana cards and 4, 4 mana cards is that bad?
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:38:36 PM
No, but why not all four {farseek}?
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 02:42:35 PM
Quote from: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:38:36 PM
No, but why not all four {farseek}?
The 1 of  {Mana Bloom} is my 4th  {Farseek} it is an enchantment so it helps and what do you think about  {Thespian's Stage} in this deck?
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:51:44 PM
No stage. Bloom is good for this deck but not better than {farseek}. Think of bloom as a 5th seek
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 03:00:11 PM
Quote from: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 02:51:44 PM
No stage. Bloom is good for this deck but not better than {farseek}. Think of bloom as a 5th seek
Im think of dropping  {Aurelia's Fury} for a  {Farseek} and dropping a  {Forest} for  {Kessig Wolf Run}
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 03:03:17 PM
You would benefit from at least one red shock. Kessig is a great call though.
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Harmon74 on March 28, 2013, 03:09:27 PM
What about {Boros Charm} in the side?  It can make all your permanents indestructible until the end of the turn, so when your opponent sides in enchantment hate for game 2.
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 03:09:43 PM
Quote from: Kaleo42 on March 28, 2013, 03:03:17 PM
You would benefit from at least one red shock. Kessig is a great call though.
Any thoughts on how to improve the sideboard?
Title: Re: Red bant
Post by: Bman0121 on March 29, 2013, 12:44:53 AM
Is  {Farseek} just better in this deck over  {Aurelia's Fury}? I feel like 3 farseek is good enough
Title: Re: Red bant need sideboard help
Post by: Bman0121 on March 29, 2013, 06:15:50 PM
Bump