iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: izik99 on March 27, 2013, 08:48:34 PM

Title: Is delver still viable?
Post by: izik99 on March 27, 2013, 08:48:34 PM
Even with it rotating out of Standard soon, would it still work?

BW with Control elements, or BR with Burn/Aggro.
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: izik99 on March 27, 2013, 08:48:53 PM
My bad- UW and UR.
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Mactitioner on March 27, 2013, 08:50:19 PM
Delver was only viable because of ponder
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Mothaelon on March 27, 2013, 09:31:09 PM
Delver is huge in legacy

Huge
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Dudecore on March 28, 2013, 10:46:16 AM
Delver is kinda weak in standard, {Pillar of Flames} deals with him pretty sufficiently.
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 08:49:34 PM
If you look at the old blue white delver decks with  {Geist of Saint Traft} and  {Runechanter's Pike} you could just replace delver with  {Cloudfin Raptor} and have your creatures just be  {Cloudfin Raptor},  {Geist of Saint Traft},  {Augur of Bolas}, and  {Snapcaster Mage} using all other cards  {Runechanter's Pike}s and instants and sorcerys
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Agrajagzz9 on March 28, 2013, 09:47:54 PM
Cloudfin raptor isn't A seven turn clock all by itself...
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 10:08:12 PM
Quote from: Potticus on March 28, 2013, 09:49:31 PM
Quote from: Agrajagzz9 on March 28, 2013, 09:47:54 PM
Cloudfin raptor isn't A seven turn clock all by itself...
With

Exactly. A bad sub
It can be evolved or equiped to make it one lol
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 10:16:40 PM
Quote from: Potticus on March 28, 2013, 10:14:54 PM
Quote from: Bman0121 on March 28, 2013, 10:08:12 PM
Quote from: Potticus on March 28, 2013, 09:49:31 PM
Quote from: Agrajagzz9 on March 28, 2013, 09:47:54 PM
Cloudfin raptor isn't A seven turn clock all by itself...
With

Exactly. A bad sub
It can be evolved or equiped to make it one lol

It's not as consistent. You can use it as a sub but it will never be as affective.
I mean obviously its not as good as delver but its a sub that can still get the job done
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: brybry723 on March 31, 2013, 03:36:32 AM
There is a U/G Delver deck that just won the first PTQ out in Arizona last week. I don't have the list on me but its posted on dailymtg.com
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Drewy2 on March 31, 2013, 03:51:41 AM
{B}{U}{G} delver is pretty good atm. The replacement for {Ponder} is {Dimir Charm}, it can also have things like {Abrupt Decay}, and {Deathrite Shaman}
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Agrajagzz9 on March 31, 2013, 06:11:41 PM
Big doesn't seem aweful but dimir charm is a poor sub for ponder. Aside from that the existence of abrupt decay alone is a serious reason to nt play it in standard. The biggest reason it was as powerful as it was was because of mana leak backup. Without effective counter magic on turn two or turn three on the play you will never get there. Just curious but what did the bug list use as its finisher?
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Harmon74 on April 01, 2013, 11:19:50 AM
Quote from: Agrajagzz9 on March 31, 2013, 06:11:41 PM
Big doesn't seem aweful but dimir charm is a poor sub for ponder. Aside from that the existence of abrupt decay alone is a serious reason to nt play it in standard. The biggest reason it was as powerful as it was was because of mana leak backup. Without effective counter magic on turn two or turn three on the play you will never get there. Just curious but what did the bug list use as its finisher?
If you have a flipped delver out, isn't  {Spell Rupture} the same as  {Mana Leak}??  I think the main reason delver is not played now is because of {Ponder}, and there is a lot of cheap removal in the standard format right now..
Title: Re: Is delver still viable?
Post by: Agrajagzz9 on April 03, 2013, 12:54:11 AM
No it's because of abrupt decay. Kla all the delvers