iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Discussion => Topic started by: Imdowd80 on March 26, 2013, 10:29:21 AM

Title: Gates
Post by: Imdowd80 on March 26, 2013, 10:29:21 AM
So when dragons maze comes out, do you think we will see a "competitive" deck that uses all 10 gates and the new land!
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Richardalcala on March 26, 2013, 10:34:01 AM
No it is to slow. Maybe at the kitchen table. 
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
I agree it's far too slow. I think the mythic land is more for flavor than anything. I don't even see it being used in edh. It's pretty terrible.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work

That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Hays413 on March 26, 2013, 10:47:30 AM
I almost got  {Biovisionary} to work... But it didn't lol. And yea the new mythic land is complete garbage.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:48:20 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work

That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩

Lol at first I thought you meant me. I have a biovisionary deck. I'm still going to do it
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Silent1236 on March 26, 2013, 10:49:14 AM
Quote from: Richardalcala on March 26, 2013, 10:34:01 AM
No it is to slow. Maybe at the kitchen table.

I still play basics over gates for kitchen table games haha.

I really don't see gates making any appearance in standard. Just too slow.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:52:12 AM
As long as you have creative people playing there will be these deck

Edit: that sounds bad. I mean people more interested in creativity over winning
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: The1337Magician on March 26, 2013, 10:54:55 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work


That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩
{Biovisionary}+ {Infinite Reflection}=WIN
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Hays413 on March 26, 2013, 10:55:00 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:52:12 AM
As long as you have creative people playing there will be these deck

Edit: that sounds bad. I mean people more interested in creativity over winning

...at the kitchen table... Yes.
Under the lights? No.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:56:44 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:52:12 AM
As long as you have creative people playing there will be these deck

Edit: that sounds bad. I mean people more interested in creativity over winning

Yes. But the OP asked about "competitive" decks. I don't envision any deck with all 10 gates anywhere near being considered competitive.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Hays413 on March 26, 2013, 10:59:00 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:56:44 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:52:12 AM
As long as you have creative people playing there will be these deck

Edit: that sounds bad. I mean people more interested in creativity over winning

Yes. But the OP asked about "competitive" decks. I don't envision any deck with all 10 gates anywhere near being considered competitive.

Lol nope not even close. The Gates in my opinion, are worse than basic lands.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 11:02:19 AM
Quote from: The1337Magician on March 26, 2013, 10:54:55 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work


That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩
{Biovisionary}+ {Infinite Reflection}=WIN

There's also  {Clone} and  {Cackling Counterpart} for that deck. Still too slow. I tried that deck out every way I could. I was determined to make it work. But bad card is baaaad any way you look at it.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Hays413 on March 26, 2013, 11:04:23 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 11:02:19 AM
Quote from: The1337Magician on March 26, 2013, 10:54:55 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work


That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩
{Biovisionary}+ {Infinite Reflection}=WIN

There's also  {Clone} and  {Cackling Counterpart} for that deck. Still too slow. I tried that deck out every way I could. I was determined to make it work. But bad card is baaaad any way you look at it.

Lol true! I tried to make mine in modern, got some really good stuff to work with, but because of the Meta in modern, it didn't stand a chance.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Dmreiss on March 26, 2013, 11:35:52 AM
Competitive is never gonna work for gates.  By the time you spend turns getting just a few out, your opponent will have done twenty points of damage.  You won't be able to focus on getting the gates and defend yourself long enough to be successful.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Umbra on March 26, 2013, 11:41:05 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:45:36 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on March 26, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
I'm going to make it happen now. I love making decks work

That's what I said about  {Biovisionary}. It only ended in sorrow. 😩

My friend won a couple games with quick mana, clone, phantasmal image etc. it seemed so harmless ;-;
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: MarduArrow on March 26, 2013, 11:57:15 AM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
I agree it's far too slow. I think the mythic land is more for flavor than anything. I don't even see it being used in edh. It's pretty terrible.

I agree its terrible, I was actually convinced they wouldn't make that an actual card, if they actually expect people to use it they had better come out with some really good 5 colour cards
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Imdowd80 on March 26, 2013, 12:05:37 PM
Sensing some major hate on this. Use the gates, ramp into {primeevil Titan} and away you go. Add the  {Expedition Map}. Hmmm mind brewing.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Rass on March 26, 2013, 02:58:46 PM
Was thinking of a bio deck with some undying 2 mana cost stuff and  {Birthing Pod} and the images.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: darkshanx on March 26, 2013, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: Imdowd80 on March 26, 2013, 12:05:37 PM
Sensing some major hate on this. Use the gates, ramp into {primeevil Titan} and away you go. Add the  {Expedition Map}. Hmmm mind brewing.

That would be so fun to do. Just destroy your opponent. Then if you have {diabolic revelation} to search for {primeval Titan}. Great fun

Although there is probably a better searching card
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Umbra on March 26, 2013, 03:06:39 PM
Quote from: Rass on March 26, 2013, 02:58:46 PM
Was thinking of a bio deck with some undying 2 mana cost stuff and  {Birthing Pod} and the images.

{Fabricate} or  {Tinker},  {Birthing Pod},  {Biovisionary},  {Aphetto Alchemist},  {Umbral Mantle}, {Biovisionary}, and  {Lotus Bloom}? Something like that?
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: AgrusKos on March 26, 2013, 03:37:06 PM
Quote from: Silent1236 on March 26, 2013, 10:49:14 AM
Quote from: Richardalcala on March 26, 2013, 10:34:01 AM
No it is to slow. Maybe at the kitchen table.

I still play basics over gates for kitchen table games haha.

I really don't see gates making any appearance in standard. Just too slow.
I use gate...
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 03:37:11 PM
Quote from: Umbra on March 26, 2013, 03:06:39 PM
Quote from: Rass on March 26, 2013, 02:58:46 PM
Was thinking of a bio deck with some undying 2 mana cost stuff and  {Birthing Pod} and the images.

{Fabricate} or  {Tinker},  {Birthing Pod},  {Biovisionary},  {Aphetto Alchemist},  {Umbral Mantle}, {Biovisionary}, and  {Lotus Bloom}? Something like that?

The problem with  {Biovisionary} is that he becomes a big target once he's in play and there isn't much you can do to protect him, let alone four of him.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Umbra on March 26, 2013, 03:41:56 PM
Quote from: Moneekahh on March 26, 2013, 03:37:11 PM
Quote from: Umbra on March 26, 2013, 03:06:39 PM
Quote from: Rass on March 26, 2013, 02:58:46 PM
Was thinking of a bio deck with some undying 2 mana cost stuff and  {Birthing Pod} and the images.

{Fabricate} or  {Tinker},  {Birthing Pod},  {Biovisionary},  {Aphetto Alchemist},  {Umbral Mantle}, {Biovisionary}, and  {Lotus Bloom}? Something like that?

The problem with  {Biovisionary} is that he becomes a big target once he's in play and there isn't much you can do to protect him, let alone four of him.

Okay what about  {Enlightened Tutor}  {Lotus Bloom}, 3 turns {silence} {Lotus Petal}  {Parallel Lives}  {Biovisionary}  {Cackling Counterpart} and  {Rite of Replication}
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Gorzo on March 26, 2013, 04:34:57 PM
I'm sure gates will see some casual play, maybe even EDH play. But competitive play? Like everyone's already said, it's probably too slow.

You never know though - never would have guessed that {Door to Nothingness} would see competitive play, but the omnidoor deck was pretty competitive for a while, and even took 1st in at least 1 tournament that I know of.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: MuggyWuggy on March 26, 2013, 05:57:56 PM
Currently in standard they have a few cards that mix with them, but I'm sure DM will have more gate related cards to make them used in standard. Also gates will change strategies in limited formats, a dual land is better than no dual land, even if there is a penalty.

Also in modern, throw down an  {Amulet of Vigor} and bam, not even shock lands, just OG dual lands.

In regards to{ biovisionary} it's too soon for the OP to considered, it will be apart of the standard lineup for a while and we have yet to see what comes around

{rite of replication} the kicker is an instant win combo that can happen with the right mix of cards

Soon I shall have all the biovisionaries and they will shoot up in amazing value meahahahahhaaaaaaaa!

Title: Re: Gates
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on March 26, 2013, 06:45:57 PM
Guildgates are completely viable in Standard. Maybe not as 4-ofs, but a couple wont hurt anything. They really aren't half bad, turn 1 it's a Shockland, after that it can be a minor annoyance but in all honesty most of the time you're going to want to play Shocklands tapped anyways, unless your playing Aggro.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Wally on March 26, 2013, 06:57:48 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on March 26, 2013, 06:45:57 PM
Guildgates are completely viable in Standard. Maybe not as 4-ofs, but a couple wont hurt anything. They really aren't half bad, turn 1 it's a Shockland, after that it can be a minor annoyance but in all honesty most of the time you're going to want to play Shocklands tapped anyways, unless your playing Aggro.

I totally agree. The other reason why shock lands are currently better is because of the tap lands see them as a normal land type so they can work together turn 1 and 2/whenever.
If those tap lands rotate out, that extra functionality is lost making the gates a possible replacement option.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: All-Mana Mania on March 26, 2013, 07:23:40 PM
I think the mythic land is great!! You DONT need it in a all colored deck. What i would do is put it in my triple colored deck (whatever it would be). I would use it then to adjust my mana. Lets say grixis. I have swamps and mountains and the rest of my hand requires islands. So i return it and get a dimir guildgate and then next turn an izzet guild gate. Yes, it will require you to run a lottle guildgates but it is worth it!
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: MuggyWuggy on March 26, 2013, 07:36:19 PM
Quote from: All-Mana Mania on March 26, 2013, 07:23:40 PM. Yes, it will require you to run a lottle guildgates but it is worth it!
A lottle.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Almosteric on March 26, 2013, 10:17:50 PM
I could only see this being somewhat competive if there is a creature or enchantment that lets gates come into play untapped. {Open the gates} so to speak.