iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 17, 2013, 03:39:19 PM

Title: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 17, 2013, 03:39:19 PM
Ok first off sorry I've been out a while Dallas hotels charge for wifi..

Rules:

1.  Incorporate the unwanted card in your deck, four copies, no sideboard placement.

2. I'm tired so please have common sense, this is the last rule I will post on here today...

Odd card is...

{Elibrus, the Binding Blade}!!!

Have fun!!! :)
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: Desolatus on March 18, 2013, 01:19:13 PM
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 17, 2013, 03:39:19 PM
Ok first off sorry I've been out a while Dallas hotels charge for wifi..

Rules:

1.  Incorporate the unwanted card in your deck, four copies, no sideboard placement.

2. I'm tired so please have common sense, this is the last rule I will post on here today...

Odd card is...

{Elibrus, the Binding Blade}!!!

Have fun!!! :)

A deck based around this guy would be terrible.

"I hit you with my {Invisible Stalker}, unequip {Elbrus, the Binding Blade} and transform it. Now I have a 13/13-"

"Ultimate Price."

"Crap."
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: Mikefrompluto on March 18, 2013, 01:23:35 PM
Quote from: Desolatus on March 18, 2013, 01:19:13 PM
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 17, 2013, 03:39:19 PM
Ok first off sorry I've been out a while Dallas hotels charge for wifi..

Rules:

1.  Incorporate the unwanted card in your deck, four copies, no sideboard placement.

2. I'm tired so please have common sense, this is the last rule I will post on here today...

Odd card is...

{Elibrus, the Binding Blade}!!!

Have fun!!! :)

A deck based around this guy would be terrible.

"I hit you with my {Invisible Stalker}, unequip {Elbrus, the Binding Blade} and transform it. Now I have a 13/13-"

"Ultimate Price."

"Crap."

A) that's why it's a challenge. Build a deck around the card to make it good.

B) {invisible stalker} implies there's {U} in deck, meaning you can add the appropriate counters to the deck. However, I refuse to play the "you play this, I play that, you play this" back and forth game.
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 18, 2013, 01:25:51 PM
That's the whole point, read #%*$ Net Decks to understand better.  Last time we did {Gloom Surgeon}.  That was fun :)
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: THE WYLDE ONE on March 18, 2013, 05:15:02 PM
I posted a deck.
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: ApexPredator on March 19, 2013, 12:32:44 AM
Does this have to be standard??
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 19, 2013, 12:33:58 AM
Yyyeeesss.....?

Right now yes, maybe I'll expand this to other formats.  But not now.
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: ApexPredator on March 19, 2013, 12:34:54 AM
Damn cuz this and stone forge mystic would be great
Title: Re: &$#% Net Decks 2
Post by: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on March 19, 2013, 12:50:40 AM
Quote from: NightWolf on March 19, 2013, 12:34:54 AM
Damn cuz this and stone forge mystic would be great
Yes, yes it would.