iMtG Server: Gathering

Zoo.  Planet Of The Apes Version (human) 75 cards, 15 sideboard 2 {Cavern of Souls} 2 {Forest} 4 {Temple Garden} 1 {Slayers' Stronghold} 4 {Sacred Foundry} 3 {Clifftop Retreat} 2 {Plains} 2 {Stomping Ground} 2 {Rootbound Crag} 22 lands 4 {Champion of the Parish} 4 {Experiment One} 2 {Boros Elite} 2 {Firefist Striker} 4 {Lightning Mauler} 4 {Mayor of Avabruck} 4 {Burning-Tree Emissary} 4 {Flinthoof Boar} 4 {Frontline Medic} 32 creatures 3 {Giant Growth} 3 {Madcap Skills} 6 other spells Sideboard 3 {Oblivion Ring} 4 {Nearheath Pilgrim} 2 {Blind Obedience} 3 {Volcanic Strength} 3 {Thalia, Guardian of Thraben} 15 sideboard cards Notes: This is more a NAYA human aggro, but with the zoo play style. Creatures that do more then their CMC. Lots of synergy with BTE

Why not 4-of Burning Tree? That card is rediculous. Although I guess that statement in its entirety can be made about multiple cards in this list. I kinda like it actually.

What about {Mayor of Avabruck}? You could play him over Thalia and just move her to the sideboard. Just a thought.

Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on March 17, 2013, 07:12:56 AM
Why not 4-of Burning Tree? That card is rediculous. Although I guess that statement in its entirety can be made about multiple cards in this list. I kinda like it actually.

What about {Mayor of Avabruck}? You could play him over Thalia and just move her to the sideboard. Just a thought.

That actually makes a lot more sense. I've updated the list a bit (not including SB) feel like the land isn't right tho. : / hitting WW or RR can be hard

Best deck name ever

Props for the deck name.

Quote from: Almosteric on March 17, 2013, 06:59:30 PM

Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on March 17, 2013, 07:12:56 AM
Why not 4-of Burning Tree? That card is rediculous. Although I guess that statement in its entirety can be made about multiple cards in this list. I kinda like it actually.

What about {Mayor of Avabruck}? You could play him over Thalia and just move her to the sideboard. Just a thought.

That actually makes a lot more sense. I've updated the list a bit (not including SB) feel like the land isn't right tho. : / hitting WW or RR can be hard

I'm not sure what to do with it to be honest, without playtesting. From the looks of it I almost want to say that you don't need Basics, and just run Indy and Core Set duals in their place, although that may be a very hasty decision.

 {Boros Charm} over  {Giant Growth} maybe?

You can think about running {Rancor} over {Madcap Skills}. if someone removes the creature with Skills, it's gone. But Rancor keeps coming back.

Quote from: Bman0121 on March 18, 2013, 12:03:48 PM
{Boros Charm} over  {Giant Growth} maybe?

Boros charm was in my first list, will consider playing with it a but, just seems more mana intensive while this deck likes to tap out almost all the time!

Quote from: Desolatus on March 18, 2013, 01:12:59 PM
You can think about running {Rancor} over {Madcap Skills}. if someone removes the creature with Skills, it's gone. But Rancor keeps coming back.

Don't get me wrong, I love rancor. I've just found with madcap and  {Firefist Striker} getting damage is pretty easy when the opponent can't block.

Quote from: Almosteric on March 18, 2013, 02:59:51 PM

Quote from: Bman0121 on March 18, 2013, 12:03:48 PM
{Boros Charm} over  {Giant Growth} maybe?

Boros charm was in my first list, will consider playing with it a but, just seems more mana intensive while this deck likes to tap out almost all the time!

{Selesnya Charm} then maybe? It's still a very nice pump and the other perks are very good. I mean it's technically still a creature if you want it to be.