Blue/Red Delver's Mage 59 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Sulfur Falls} 7 {Island} 8 {Swamp} 19 lands 2 {Stormblood Berserker} 4 {Snapcaster Mage} 2 {Chandra's Phoenix} 4 {Delver of Secrets} 4 {Stromkirk Noble} 16 creatures 4 {Mana Leak} 4 {Ponder} 4 {Incinerate} 4 {Shock} 4 {Brimstone Volley} 4 {Negate} 24 other spells Sideboard Notes: Just pulled the final lands today? So wht you guys think? Still thinking of a side board? Thoughts |
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 02, 2012, 08:46:01 PM
Why not use galvanic blast? It is just as good.
Quote from: Nypinto123 on February 03, 2012, 12:24:26 AMIt doesn't matter, galvanic blast is simply a better card than shock. Use that instead. Perhaps you may get lucky with 3 shrines or something, its better than nothing at all.
Not running any artifacts at the moment. Dont even know what i would take out to put artifacts. I think it may degard the deck?
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:26:25 AMHe doesn't run any form of Artifacts, for his deck a {Galvanic Blast} is exactly the same as a {Shock}.Quote from: Nypinto123 on February 03, 2012, 12:24:26 AMIt doesn't matter, galvanic blast is simply a better card than shock. Use that instead. Perhaps you may get lucky with 3 shrines or something, its better than nothing at all.
Not running any artifacts at the moment. Dont even know what i would take out to put artifacts. I think it may degard the deck?
Quote from: Nypinto123 on February 03, 2012, 12:24:26 AMIt's strictly better than {Shock}. Even if you don't have artifacts, for no extra cost, you might trick your opponent into thinking that you do. They might decide to sideboard in an {Ancient Grudge}, which would actually be a wasted card for them. hehehe
Not running any artifacts at the moment. Dont even know what i would take out to put artifacts. I think it may degard the deck?
Quote from: BlackJester on February 03, 2012, 12:29:46 AMDidn't think about that, deception is a huge part of the game. The ability to psych out your opponent properly can win matches on it's own.Quote from: Nypinto123 on February 03, 2012, 12:24:26 AMIt's strictly better than {Shock}. Even if you don't have artifacts, for no extra cost, you might trick your opponent into thinking that you do. They might decide to sideboard in an {Ancient Grudge}, which would actually be a wasted card for them. hehehe
Not running any artifacts at the moment. Dont even know what i would take out to put artifacts. I think it may degard the deck?
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AMIf that's the case, then given the decklist your suggestion for {Galvanic Blast} really was pointless.
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.
Quote from: BlackJester on February 03, 2012, 12:39:57 AMNo it wasn't, according to your example, you are making your opponent play around your artifacts (that dont exist)and galvanic blastQuote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AMIf that's the case, then given the decklist your suggestion for {Galvanic Blast} really was pointless.
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 01:04:34 AMQuote from: BlackJester on February 03, 2012, 12:39:57 AMNo it wasn't, according to your example, you are making your opponent play around your artifacts (that dont exist)and galvanic blastQuote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AMIf that's the case, then given the decklist your suggestion for {Galvanic Blast} really was pointless.
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AM
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.
Quote from: BlackJester on February 03, 2012, 01:07:56 AMYou are still none the less play around stuff, whether they exist or not is irrelevant. As long as your opponent is convinced it exists, that's good enough.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 01:04:34 AMQuote from: BlackJester on February 03, 2012, 12:39:57 AMNo it wasn't, according to your example, you are making your opponent play around your artifacts (that dont exist)and galvanic blastQuote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AMIf that's the case, then given the decklist your suggestion for {Galvanic Blast} really was pointless.
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 03, 2012, 12:35:03 AM
Naw, just make them play around things you have, one of the most basic part of the game.
See? You just said to make them play around the things you have. I know you're just trying to confuse me, but it won't be that easy. :P
Quote from: Karrthus on February 03, 2012, 01:10:53 AMî,,› How did we miss that?!?!?
What are the swamps for?
Quote from: Validan on February 03, 2012, 10:50:04 AMî,,
I think it's part of his plan to psych his opponents out XP