iMtG Server: Gathering

Deadeye Messenger 60 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Drowned Catacomb} 5 {Swamp} 5 {Island} 3 {Hinterland Harbor} 5 {Forest} 2 {Overgrown Tomb} 24 lands 3 {Hover Barrier} 2 {Geralf's Messenger} 4 {Doorkeeper} 2 {Galvanic Alchemist} 3 {Trestle Troll} 3 {Axebane Guardian} 2 {Deadeye Navigator} 19 creatures 3 {Inspiration} 4 {Farseek} 2 {Increasing Ambition} 3 {Divination} 2 {Diabolic Revelation} 3 {Think Twice} 17 other spells Sideboard Notes: Threw this together real quick. Based off of someone else's deck that used the navigator bonded with {zealous conscripts}. The idea is to do an infinite mana loop with {axebane guardian} and {galvanic alchemist} and then endlessly flicker {geralf's messenger} bonded to {deadeye navigator}.

Thoughts?

Who was this someone using conscripts with navigator!? Thats genius!

Seriously though, the diabolic is a great attempt to make up for low numbers of the pieces, but for this to really work it will need  a playset of messengers. Also consider {manor gargoyle} to help with the defender concept.

{Bloodhunter Bat} can do the same thing as geralf, and it is less mana-intensive! ;)

Ever think about putting in  {Thragtusk}

Quote from: Kaleo42 on December 02, 2012, 12:05:17 AM
Who was this someone using conscripts with navigator!? Thats genius!

Seriously though, the diabolic is a great attempt to make up for low numbers of the pieces, but for this to really work it will need  a playset of messengers. Also consider {manor gargoyle} to help with the defender concept.

Yes yes, full credit goes to you for sparking the idea. I would love to have a playset of messengers but at the moment, I only have three. If i decide I want to build this, ill definitely change things around to add a fourth messenger and also play around with the {manor gargoyle}s.

Quote from: Coffee Vampire on December 02, 2012, 12:21:24 AM
{Bloodhunter Bat} can do the same thing as geralf, and it is less mana-intensive! ;)

Aaawwee yes. I didn't even think of that before. Thanks!

Quote from: Nicolbolas74 on December 02, 2012, 12:35:40 AM
Ever think about putting in  {Thragtusk}

$23 a pop :( Too expensive for me.

Quote from: Kaleo42 on December 02, 2012, 12:05:17 AM
Who was this someone using conscripts with navigator!? Thats genius!

Seriously though, the diabolic is a great attempt to make up for low numbers of the pieces, but for this to really work it will need  a playset of messengers. Also consider {manor gargoyle} to help with the defender concept.

Also, you think it'd be a good idea to do playsets of the other three creatures involved? That's basically the only win con of the deck, and I added a decent amount of draw, but would it benefit more with playsets of the cards needed?

Quote from: Mikefrompluto on December 02, 2012, 01:28:59 AM

Quote from: Coffee Vampire on December 02, 2012, 12:21:24 AM
{Bloodhunter Bat} can do the same thing as geralf, and it is less mana-intensive! ;)

Aaawwee yes. I didn't even think of that before. Thanks!

Np! I had it used against me once at fnm lol