Down To Humanity 75 cards, 15 sideboard 20 {Plains} 20 lands 2 {Elite Vanguard} 4 {Champion of the Parish} 4 {Grand Abolisher} 2 {Doomed Traveler} 3 {Gideon's Lawkeeper} 4 {Mirran Crusader} 4 {Hero of Bladehold} 2 {Fiend Hunter} 25 creatures 2 {Sword of Feast and Famine} 2 {Sword of War and Peace} 4 {Honor of the Pure} 1 {Elspeth Tirel} 4 {Oblivion Ring} 2 {Angelic Destiny} 15 other spells Sideboard 2 {Demystify} 2 {Mighty Leap} 2 {Nihil Spellbomb} 2 {Elite Inquisitor} 2 {Timely Reinforcements} 2 {Stave Off} 2 {Bonds of Faith} 1 {Gather the Townsfolk} 15 sideboard cards Notes: Or Hold the Line 4.0 |
Quote from: Validan on January 24, 2012, 08:05:36 PM
Looks good as is, unfortunately there wasn't a lot of love for white in dark ascension
Quote from: Appleguru56 on January 28, 2012, 12:20:48 AMîŸ
e the entre deck except for the sideboard. Cards there are ether underpowered versions of other things, or simply don't fit in this deck at all. I would cut the demistifies since it kills like 2 enchantments that are known to man (in this metagame anyways). Cut one copy of day because it goes against your goal to establish board control. Something that fights defensively in an aggro deck ruins the synergy. Also, cut moment of heroism and giant leap because they do not help you win anymore than your deck already does against most matchups. And I will cut the elite inquisitors since your deck is already creature based and elite inquisitor does not help win anymore than the other things already present in your deck. The sultured priests can be cut as well since they really don't do anything compared to what you can have in its place.
I would then add: 3{spellskite}, 1{sword of feast and famine}, 1{sword of war and peace}, 3{timely reinforcements}, 1{revoke existence}, 2{divine offering}, 2{dismember}
I would also personally splash blue for the {Geist of saint traft}s and mana leaks
Other than that, the deck looks fine
Quote from: Validan on January 31, 2012, 07:19:13 PMAgreed!
If you do, take out {bonds of faith}
Quote from: ChrisRodriguez on February 01, 2012, 04:57:41 PMWhy would anyone substitute a removable removal for a win condition?
I would take out {elspeth Tirel} for an other {feind hunter}, but that's just me. I think having the ability to remove an other blocker/attacker is better for an aggro deck. More so then a Planeswalker. Just my opinion though.
Quote from: Validan on February 01, 2012, 05:56:55 PM
How about you trade that other {angelic destiny} to me XD
Quote from: Bernardcs on February 01, 2012, 08:45:59 PMQuote from: Validan on February 01, 2012, 05:56:55 PM
How about you trade that other {angelic destiny} to me XD
What???? Hahahahaha
Quote from: Validan on February 01, 2012, 08:34:28 PMWhy does it matter if he already has one?
Maybe he figures it's cheaper?
Quote from: Bernardcs on February 02, 2012, 04:12:27 AM
I just have two {Angelic Destiny}, but I could buy a third one...
What about adding {Gather the Townsfolk} to the mainboard?
Quote from: Slaga slasha on February 01, 2012, 10:49:02 PM
Grand aboliter is awesome vs control I can smell the rage quit from here!