iMtG Server: Gathering

W/G Humans 2.0 60 cards, 15 sideboard 1 {Ghost Quarter} 4 {Sunpetal Grove} 2 {Gavony Township} 3 {Razorverge Thicket} 8 {Plains} 4 {Forest} 22 lands 1 {Angelic Overseer} 4 {Doomed Traveler} 1 {Hero of Bladehold} 2 {Grand Abolisher} 4 {Gideon's Lawkeeper} 1 {Mikaeus, the Lunarch} 3 {Mirran Crusader} 4 {Champion of the Parish} 2 {Mayor of Avabruck} 4 {Avacyn's Pilgrim} 26 creatures 4 {Honor of the Pure} 4 {Sword of War and Peace} 4 {Oblivion Ring} 12 other spells Sideboard 1 {Revoke Existence} 3 {Rebuke} 1 {Divine Offering} 2 {Creeping Corrosion} 1 {Grand Abolisher} 2 {Timely Reinforcements} 1 {Ghost Quarter} 2 {Purify the Grave} 2 {Surgical Extraction} 15 sideboard cards Notes:

Here is my updated deck. I am wondering, is there anything I can really change up for mirror match up /regular WW? It is A pretty big part of the meta game at FNM.

I would take out the {Honor of the Pure} and add {Day of Judgement}. the bad thing about WW is they usually don't have a hand very long, so you blow the board then they're playing off the top of their deck.

I have a very similar deck. It was posted as Angelic Thrun. Mine pretty much stops most decks early game so I can win mid to late game.

Quote from: Karrthus on January 19, 2012, 03:24:04 AM
I would take out the {Honor of the Pure} and add {Day of Judgement}. the bad thing about WW is they usually don't have a hand very long, so you blow the board then they're playing off the top of their deck.

Good idea, I will switch it up and try it out at fnm

Quote from: Alaskanice on January 17, 2012, 11:59:05 PM
Here is my updated deck. I am wondering, is there anything I can really change up for mirror match up /regular WW? It is A pretty big part of the meta game at FNM.

DoJ in sideboard.

Well, forgot to side in {day of judgement}, but still ended up winning in our tournament.

Quote from: Alaskanice on January 21, 2012, 02:18:10 AM
Well, forgot to side in {day of judgement}, but still ended up winning in our tournament.

Yay!
What was the meta?

RDW, infect, some form of WW, delver, then a grand architect style deck. Those Are from most to least that i saw.

Also, I am going to remove my {rebuke}s and {creeping corrosion} for more {fiend hunter} and {revoke existence} in the sideboard.

Quote from: Alaskanice on January 21, 2012, 02:36:22 AM
RDW, infect, some form of WW, delver, then a grand architect style deck. Those Are from most to least that i saw.

Last week it was Mirran crusaders and swords.

Why run {Purify the Grave} over {Surgical Extraction}?

Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on January 21, 2012, 07:51:55 AM
Why run {Purify the Grave} over {Surgical Extraction}?

I run both, and it works well. If they are only running 1 of a card on their deck, it is a waste to surgically extract it when I could just purify the grave to get rid of it, and then purify another card the next time they try to play from grave.

Quote from: Alaskanice on January 21, 2012, 01:18:53 PM

Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on January 21, 2012, 07:51:55 AM
Why run {Purify the Grave} over {Surgical Extraction}?

I run both, and it works well. If they are only running 1 of a card on their deck, it is a waste to surgically extract it when I could just purify the grave to get rid of it, and then purify another card the next time they try to play from grave.

I agree. I do like {Surgical Extraction} let's you look at their hand and library as early as turn one if they have a card in their gy.  And you can put it in any deck too. 

Again, that is why I have 2 in this deck. I agree that it is a good card, but siding in all four feels more like a waste when I can add more variety to what I exile from graveyard. I do have 4 in my other decks, but since I have {purify the grave}, I keep it at 2 which works well with the rest of the way my sideboard plays. Something I was debating changing however, was adding 4 {birds of paradise}. I liked how some people would equip the sword to the bird to attack, and the re equip to the defenders after the attack. People seem too afraid to attack my {doomed traveler}s and I can only have so many {oblivian ring}s.