Text only | Text with Images

iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: xBeLLaTriX on October 16, 2012, 06:36:10 PM

Title: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 16, 2012, 06:36:10 PM
B/R Vampires

75 cards, 15 sideboard


4 {Blood Crypt}
1 {Stensia Bloodhall}
4 {Dragonskull Summit}
8 {Swamp}
5 {Mountain}
22 lands


4 {Vampire Nocturnus}
3 {Bloodline Keeper}
4 {Vampire Nighthawk}
4 {Blood Artist}
4 {Stromkirk Noble}
4 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
4 {Stromkirk Captain}
27 creatures


3 {Killing Wave}
2 {Tragic Slip}
3 {Dreadbore}
3 {Sign in Blood}
11 other spells


Sideboard

3 {Duress}
2 {Rakdos Charm}
2 {Olivia Voldaren}
2 {Tribute to Hunger}
2 {Mutilate}
2 {Ultimate Price}
2 {Slaughter Games}
15 sideboard cards



Took your guys (great) suggestions and made a few revisions.  Still need help tho!
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on October 16, 2012, 07:58:51 PM
{Rakdos Charm} is a better {Tormod's Crypt}, it gives you a lot more options when you draw it, also maybe consider 3 Nobles in the main? Nocturnus and him don't get along very well.
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Calebestes on October 16, 2012, 08:44:26 PM
Falkenrath Aris you need 4.  Just hands down.   
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 16, 2012, 10:01:55 PM
Quote from: Calebestes on October 16, 2012, 08:44:26 PM
Falkenrath Aris you need 4.  Just hands down.

Don't have 4
:(
And don't really want to get 2 more either :(
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 17, 2012, 08:04:33 AM
Bump
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Mothaelon on October 17, 2012, 08:28:18 AM
Honestly if you dropped the regent and picked up two more aristocrat, this deck would be phenomenal
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 17, 2012, 01:51:04 PM
Quote from: Mothaelon on October 17, 2012, 08:28:18 AM
Honestly if you dropped the regent and picked up two more aristocrat, this deck would be phenomenal

What do you think is more important, 2 {Cavern of Souls} or 2 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on October 17, 2012, 01:54:30 PM
Quote from: xBeLLaTriX on October 17, 2012, 01:51:04 PM
Quote from: Mothaelon on October 17, 2012, 08:28:18 AM
Honestly if you dropped the regent and picked up two more aristocrat, this deck would be phenomenal

What do you think is more important, 2 {Cavern of Souls} or 2 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}
Aristocrat is rather beast
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 17, 2012, 02:03:18 PM
K I added in the two aristocrats, and ya I agree, she does do work...  Maybe ill slide a Regent in the sideboard for fun, idk.
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Mothaelon on October 17, 2012, 03:30:45 PM
Quote from: xBeLLaTriX on October 17, 2012, 02:03:18 PM
K I added in the two aristocrats, and ya I agree, she does do work...  Maybe ill slide a Regent in the sideboard for fun, idk.

Try to get at least two cavern for the future, they aren't necessary cause control isn't near as dominant now as it was pre rtr, but it still exists
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 19, 2012, 04:43:57 PM
I had a question, what matchups would I side in {Olivia Voldaren} for??
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on October 20, 2012, 12:05:52 AM
Quote from: xBeLLaTriX on October 19, 2012, 04:43:57 PM
I had a question, what matchups would I side in {Olivia Voldaren} for??
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Mothaelon on October 20, 2012, 02:33:33 AM
Quote from: xBeLLaTriX on October 20, 2012, 12:05:52 AM
Quote from: xBeLLaTriX on October 19, 2012, 04:43:57 PM
I had a question, what matchups would I side in {Olivia Voldaren} for??

Control, like say your opponent is playing a bunch if small creatures, you can just ping them all day

Or if you are going against a bigger Aggro deck, like just butter creatures, can ping and take
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: xBeLLaTriX on November 10, 2012, 07:24:41 PM
Bump for helping another deck
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Mothaelon on November 10, 2012, 08:48:04 PM
This deck is very similar to mine, except to help out

I'd take out killin wave and add 3 pilar of flame

Pillar is just phenomenal right now and killing wave is good, but pillar takes care of their early game via ramping or just taking out early game threats like gravecrawlers and messengers
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Teysa karlov on November 26, 2012, 09:10:50 PM
Take out the imtg://card?name=Stensia%20Bloodhall its terrible may be nice with the theme but put in cavern of souls
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Teysa karlov on November 26, 2012, 09:12:31 PM
Quote from: Mothaelon on November 10, 2012, 08:48:04 PM
This deck is very similar to mine, except to help out

I'd take out killin wave and add 3 pilar of flame

Pillar is just phenomenal right now and killing wave is good, but pillar takes care of their early game via ramping or just taking out early game threats like gravecrawlers and messengers
. Searing spears instead of pillars
Title: Re: B/R Vampires Revised
Post by: Mothaelon on November 27, 2012, 12:12:43 AM
Quote from: Shadowclothes on November 26, 2012, 09:12:31 PM
Quote from: Mothaelon on November 10, 2012, 08:48:04 PM
This deck is very similar to mine, except to help out

I'd take out killin wave and add 3 pilar of flame

Pillar is just phenomenal right now and killing wave is good, but pillar takes care of their early game via ramping or just taking out early game threats like gravecrawlers and messengers
. Searing spears instead of pillars

Nope, pillar

Pillar exiles on kill, that's why it's preferred over searing spear

It answers undying, zombies, frites
Text only | Text with Images