When it says "untap that creature", does that mean the creature basically gains vigilance until end of turn?
no if you got another combat phase the creature would still have to tap itself.
So what's the point of it saying that then?
{bazaar krovad}
Quote from: Nobbert on September 28, 2012, 09:54:29 PM
So what's the point of it saying that then?
{bazaar krovad}
you can block with it next turn
Quote from: AgrusKos on September 28, 2012, 10:35:03 PM
Quote from: Nobbert on September 28, 2012, 09:54:29 PM
So what's the point of it saying that then?
{bazaar krovad}
you can block with it next turn
Yeah I mean that's what I was implying in my original post.
I was assuming we understood there would be only one combat phase. -_-
Because giving a creature vigilance AFTER it has attacked is pretty pointless. 😜
Quote from: BlackJester on September 28, 2012, 10:59:38 PM
Because giving a creature vigilance AFTER it has attacked is pretty pointless. 😜
I said BASICALLY
like in layman's terms
GUH
{Godsire}
There's a difference.
Okay I know this but it was easier than typing " the targeted creature attacks, then is untapped after attacking from the bazar's ability"
So what was your original question?
Were you just making an observation that its like vigilance?
The creature will tap from attacking, then untap when targeted by the Krovod. this is important to some cards. It's different than vigilance because a Vigilance creature never taps in the first place.
And if you're asking what the point of playing it is, it'll put a big butt on another attacker so he's harder to block, and hang him back for. Wxt turn to block.
Quote from: BlackJester on September 29, 2012, 12:44:22 AM
So what was your original question?
Were you just making an observation that its like vigilance?
Sort of. I was asking if my observation was correct
Technically no.
But yes it would be similar to a situation including vigilance.
It's LIKE vigilance, but there are differences worth noting. These have already been mentioned.