iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 03:23:21 AM

Title: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 03:23:21 AM

Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)

60 cards, 15 sideboard


4 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
4 {Dragonskull Summit}
1 {Rootbound Crag}
2 {Rootbound Crag}
1 {Swamp}
1 {Swamp}
1 {Swamp}
1 {Swamp}
1 {Swamp}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Mountain}

22 lands


4 {Stromkirk Noble}
2 {Child of Night}
2 {Bloodcrazed Neonate}
4 {Rakish Heir}
3 {Bloodline Keeper}
2 {Olivia Voldaren}
1 {Bloodlord of Vaasgoth}

18 creatures


2 {Liliana of the Veil}
2 {Curse of Stalked Prey}
3 {Doom Blade}
4 {Gut Shot}
3 {Vampiric Fury}
4 {Volt Charge}
2 {Tezzeret's Gambit}

20 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Phyrexian Metamorph}
1 {Bloodlord of Vaasgoth}
2 {Surgical Extraction}
2 {Go for the Throat}
3 {Dismember}
3 {Ancient Grudge}
2 {Act of Aggression}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:
Seems... Smoother...
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 03:28:24 AM
I gave in... The deck had a few too many lumps, four to be exact. I needed more assault and proliferation, and damn it all if you don't like the {Child of Night}, I think it's a pretty solid card. And the {Tezzerret's Gambit}s were most needed.
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Alaskanice on January 03, 2012, 03:29:50 AM
Wow, this deck looks fairly similar to my R/B. I am just curious, how does having Liliana do in this deck? I feel like she doesn't really follow the style much, but she is a good card so I am not sure how it would work.
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 03:35:42 AM
She's a {Gatekeeper of Malakir} that can go off multiple times, for this deck, that's all I need her to be. I think the new Sorin is going to end up stealing her thunder though, as long as he's not a reprint =P
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 03:43:45 AM
Also, she has counters =D
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Alaskanice on January 03, 2012, 03:54:39 AM
Ah, maybe I will keep mine in my deck after all then. Well, other than your {child of night} I really like your deck, but you already know about what others will say about that card. Do you have a good amount of proliferate in your deck with the 6 cards you have for it? I feel a full set of gambits made a huge difference.
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 04:05:10 AM
Getting in the first two was hard enough, I couldn't even begin to think of what to drop in order to make a playset. Creatures are out of the question, I need 'em, and the other spells are either removal or proliferate. I simply dropped the playset of {Bump In The Night}s, that was a really hard decision in itself. I think I'll leave it where it is right now until Dark Ascension comes out, then I'm going to have nightmares over keeping this deck at 60 XD
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Karrthus on January 03, 2012, 04:46:13 AM
Pretty solid deck, and I like {Child of Night} to. It's a 2/1 for 2 with an ability. You can't go wrong there.
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: cltrn81 on January 03, 2012, 08:34:19 AM
Quote from: Karrthus on January 03, 2012, 04:46:13 AM
Pretty solid deck, and I like {Child of Night} to. It's a 2/1 for 2 with an ability. You can't go wrong there.

I agree, I like {child of night}.  He was my vamp deck for a long time.  He ended up being replaced by {Phyrexian Obliterator}.....who does not make room for that?????
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Prophylaxis on January 03, 2012, 10:29:10 AM
Still no more {Stormblood Berserker}? :(:(:(:(:(
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 03, 2012, 05:24:56 PM
It's not a vampire =/ And the Child can block, eventually I might end up replacing the neonate with her, but it's hard man, I love Slith!!!
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 04, 2012, 04:22:08 AM
Soooo, I have an issue, I'm not gonna be able to get my second Lilly, and I need a permanent solution, any thoughts? I'm thinking another creature, maybe a 4th Keeper? I need a big target, which is exactly what she was.
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Deeliser10 on January 04, 2012, 07:33:50 AM
{grave Titan}.
{sheoldred, the whispering one}
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on January 04, 2012, 07:48:15 AM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on January 04, 2012, 04:22:08 AM
Soooo, I have an issue, I'm not gonna be able to get my second Lilly, and I need a permanent solution, any thoughts? I'm thinking another creature, maybe a 4th Keeper? I need a big target, which is exactly what she was.
I should've mentioned I'd very much like to keep it tribal 
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Deeliser10 on January 04, 2012, 11:05:47 PM
{chancellor of the dross}. Is a vampire...
Title: Re: Bloodletting 2.0 (Now With Less Bumps!)
Post by: Prophylaxis on January 05, 2012, 11:18:51 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on January 04, 2012, 07:48:15 AM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on January 04, 2012, 04:22:08 AM
Soooo, I have an issue, I'm not gonna be able to get my second Lilly, and I need a permanent solution, any thoughts? I'm thinking another creature, maybe a 4th Keeper? I need a big target, which is exactly what she was.
I should've mentioned I'd very much like to keep it tribal 
I still recommend the berserkers. When you're playing this deck and draw a child of night, mentally replace that child with the berserker and see how you feel.