iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Discussion => Topic started by: Dmreiss on September 13, 2012, 04:36:48 PM

Title: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Dmreiss on September 13, 2012, 04:36:48 PM
I was going through cards on the database, and I noticed Homelands was probably one of the least popular pricewise.  I also don't use cards from that set near as much as other sets.  Other opinions or ideas?
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Xanzurth on September 13, 2012, 04:40:00 PM
I would have to say Fallen Empires do to the massive over printing.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: BlackJester on September 13, 2012, 04:41:27 PM
Yeah, Homelands was fail.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Dmreiss on September 13, 2012, 04:44:28 PM
Fallen Empires was the first set they did unlimited printings, but there were some solid cards in that set.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on September 13, 2012, 05:01:34 PM
Homelands was just so bad. That was the worst set in magic history. As bad as it was it has to be.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: BlackJester on September 13, 2012, 05:28:43 PM
I like how Coldsnap was WotC's way of pretending Homelands never existed. 😂
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Langku on September 17, 2012, 02:43:19 AM
The worst pack I ever bought was a few months ago. I saw these old packs at a hole in the wall nerd store and figured "who knows, I'll probably get something vintage and super valuable!" The pack was horrible and the rare, a {savage firecat} was the icing on the crapcake. I'd never heard of Odyssey but now I think I didn't miss much by missing that block. Why do you guys all hate homelands so much? I started in Lorwyn and have no concept of anything before the first Mirrodin block.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Langku on September 17, 2012, 02:51:44 AM
(addendum) After further research I discovered Odyssey had this Squirrel mechanic or tribe or something. My forthcoming nutmuncher deck will bring Odyssey back from the brink of oblivion.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Dmreiss on September 17, 2012, 07:32:06 AM
I believe that Wizards had complaints about different art on a card was confusing and difficult for collectors.  That is why there is only one piece of art for cards now.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Dmreiss on September 17, 2012, 07:35:51 AM
I had hopes for Homelands when it came out too.  I even bought a box, like I did for Fallen Empires and Ice Age.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Piotr on September 17, 2012, 08:08:18 AM
I was playing during Homelands and Fallen Empires. When I returned to the game I bought sets of both due to nostalgia and super low eBay price ;)
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: DirtyMustachio on September 17, 2012, 02:30:24 PM
Fallen empires...

Anything else with banding...

Snow sets
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: BlackJester on September 17, 2012, 03:06:07 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on September 17, 2012, 08:26:51 AM
I would've figured the collectors would've loved having alternate art. They go ape for alternate art comic covers. Ithknk Its usually players that are so concerned with similarity on different cards, even though they could just play one with all the same art.

Speakig of, I heard the pros will play with all the same art basic lands, so if they get {Gitaxian probed} or {duress}ed  or whatever it's more difficult for their opponent to figure out what they have afterwards.

Four crappy alt arts on crappy commons an uncommon was what you ended up with at the end.

To some LGS owner - "Do you have that one art for the {Homarid}?  You know, the one that looks like a lobster?  No, not that one the OTHER one that look like a lobster?  No, that's the one that looks like a crab?  Look, I'm trying to collect all the different arts for Fallen Empires.  I've got all four {Combat Medic}s, all four {Icatian Infantry}... blah blah blah..."

~Some jerk collector like me.

In a set with 102 cards, you end up with ~250 UNIQUE cards, many redundant and worth mere cents.

It's a novel idea, but really not worth it.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Piotr on September 17, 2012, 05:12:03 PM
Worst of all, there were no collector's numbers at the time.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: BlackJester on September 17, 2012, 07:43:08 PM
Or rarity indicators!
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Dudecore on September 17, 2012, 08:43:17 PM
Quote from: BlackJester on September 17, 2012, 03:06:07 PM
Quote from: KangaRod on September 17, 2012, 08:26:51 AM
I would've figured the collectors would've loved having alternate art. They go ape for alternate art comic covers. Ithknk Its usually players that are so concerned with similarity on different cards, even though they could just play one with all the same art.

Speakig of, I heard the pros will play with all the same art basic lands, so if they get {Gitaxian probed} or {duress}ed  or whatever it's more difficult for their opponent to figure out what they have afterwards.

Four crappy alt arts on crappy commons an uncommon was what you ended up with at the end.

To some LGS owner - "Do you have that one art for the {Homarid}?  You know, the one that looks like a lobster?  No, not that one the OTHER one that look like a lobster?  No, that's the one that looks like a crab?  Look, I'm trying to collect all the different arts for Fallen Empires.  I've got all four {Combat Medic}s, all four {Icatian Infantry}... blah blah blah..."

~Some jerk collector like me.

In a set with 102 cards, you end up with ~250 UNIQUE cards, many redundant and worth mere cents.

It's a novel idea, but really not worth it.

Crab people. Crab people. Look like crabs, talk like people.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Double-O-Scotch on September 17, 2012, 09:33:46 PM
I agree fallen empires AND homelands were horrible but nothing made more magic players quit than those stoopit beebles. Tough call but no set was worse than those stoopit beebles.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: Rass on September 17, 2012, 09:35:33 PM
Has to be alpha. I mean you cannot even use those cards in your decks.
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: BlackJester on September 18, 2012, 12:09:29 AM
Quote from: Double-O-Scotch on September 17, 2012, 09:33:46 PM
I agree fallen empires AND homelands were horrible but nothing made more magic players quit than those stoopit beebles. Tough call but no set was worse than those stoopit beebles.
Are you referring to {Bouncing Beebles} or the flavor text on {Bursting Beebles}?
Title: Re: Least Popular Set?
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on September 18, 2012, 04:37:03 AM
Quote from: Langku on September 17, 2012, 02:43:19 AM
The worst pack I ever bought was a few months ago. I saw these old packs at a hole in the wall nerd store and figured "who knows, I'll probably get something vintage and super valuable!" The pack was horrible and the rare, a {savage firecat} was the icing on the crapcake. I'd never heard of Odyssey but now I think I didn't miss much by missing that block. Why do you guys all hate homelands so much? I started in Lorwyn and have no concept of anything before the first Mirrodin block.
Dude, I love Odyssey, {Werebear} and {Wild Mongrel} =D