12 {Mountain}
4 {Smoldering Spires}
4 {Teetering Peaks}
20 lands
4 {Goblin Chieftain}
4 {Goblin Wardriver}
3 {Tuktuk the Explorer}
4 {Ember Hauler}
4 {Goblin Guide}
19 creatures
4 {Lightning Bolt}
4 {Goblin Grenade}
4 {Mark of Mutiny}
3 {Brimstone Volley}
3 {Shock}
3 {Staggershock}
21 other spells
Sideboard
3 {Shiv's Embrace}
3 {Blasphemous Act}
3 {Goblin Tunneler}
3 {Grotag Siege-Runner}
3 {Goblin Ruinblaster}
15 sideboard cards
This is a deck Im sure most of you have built but didn't post because goblins are a cheap way to win. So I'm posting it for you guys. |
My goblins would beat the life outa this deck no {goblin king}'s {chancellor of the forge}'s. This deck makes me sad.
Goblinking, just because it's your namesake, doesn't mean {Goblin King} is a strong card. Especially if your opponent isn't playing red.
What concerns me is the absence of {Goblin Lackey}, {Goblin Ringleader}, and {Warren Instigator}.
Edit: okay, I jus noticed this is an Extended deck... ðŸ˜"
Quote from: BlackJester on January 01, 2012, 02:52:05 AM
What concerns me is the absence of {Goblin Lackey}, {Goblin Ringleader}, and {Warren Instigator}.
Edit: okay, I jus noticed this is an Extended deck... ðŸ˜"
{Warren Instigator} is fair game.
I would have put the instigator but I don't have any. I also need a {Siege-gang Commander} or 2.
Even if they arent running red the +1/1 is better then runing 1/1 run 4 of the kings 4 chancellors and 4 chieftains the bonus is amazing
paying 1RR in a goblin deck slows it down to much. The {Goblin Chieftain} is the replacement, it makes up for cost by adding haste. Needs more cheapo Moggs for speed.
I'm not a big fan of any of the chancellors. I play alot of aggro, and when I play red I prefer to have the game over by turn 5 not 7
{Goblin Arsonist}
{Goblin Bushwhacker}
{Goblin Artillery}
Finally, {Goblin King} is not legal in Extended.
I just found that out sadly o well I play for fun so eh
I wold take out {mark of mutiny} and replace with {seering blaze}