Sparkle Ninja : trade thief AND liar
Trials
DownJune 15, 2014, 11:49:18 PM
I know this isn't really my business and I don't mean to intrude but is there a point in banning her if she's already left?
Like
Ban
Quote
Report
June 18, 2014, 10:43:57 AM
Also a note was attached to the cards: this isn't Cynthia's fault
This would suggest that cards were sent on Cynthia's behalf by another entity, who took the blame? If it was true, what should be logical punishment dealt by Cynthia to this person, who was late sending cards?
June 18, 2014, 12:54:04 PM
I would say to never rely on said person again. But normally all trades for Cynthia go thru Quinn..June 18, 2014, 01:15:31 PM
I would say to never rely on said person again. But normally all trades for Cynthia go thru Quinn..
The situation might be that Quinn is actually doing a favour rather than enjoying sending cards on Cynthia's behalf, not sure if in that case that would be logical punishment
June 22, 2014, 02:21:57 PM
Personally? She did (we think) lie a lot, but give her another shot. It's not like it impacts our lives that she made those claims. The trading, she sent late, but that's no problem. I say everyone should keep cool. Why?This was interesting.
That is quite obvious, but what do you make of it?
June 22, 2014, 02:29:05 PM
Personally? She did (we think) lie a lot, but give her another shot. It's not like it impacts our lives that she made those claims. The trading, she sent late, but that's no problem. I say everyone should keep cool. Why?This was interesting.
That is quite obvious, but what do you make of it?
S/he left on their own personal desire.
June 22, 2014, 02:30:33 PM
I'm aware, but it seemed like people weren't giving her a second shot.Personally? She did (we think) lie a lot, but give her another shot. It's not like it impacts our lives that she made those claims. The trading, she sent late, but that's no problem. I say everyone should keep cool. Why?This was interesting.
That is quite obvious, but what do you make of it?
S/he left on their own personal desire.
June 22, 2014, 02:43:32 PM
I'm aware, but it seemed like people weren't giving her a second shot.
Can you elaborate on this?? No one said get the f out.
June 22, 2014, 03:09:30 PM
From what I saw people were being generally aggressive, they didn't say "just leave" but I can understand why Sparkle might think that's what they meant.I'm aware, but it seemed like people weren't giving her a second shot.
Can you elaborate on this?? No one said get the f out.
June 22, 2014, 03:25:14 PM
From what I saw people were being generally aggressive, they didn't say "just leave" but I can understand why Sparkle might think that's what they meant.I'm aware, but it seemed like people weren't giving her a second shot.
Can you elaborate on this?? No one said get the f out.
This I can agree with, there has been a ship ton of mob mentality on here lately. I personally say that yes, sparkle did have quite a few posts where I thought she full of crap. But frankly, who the fark cares? The (alleged) simple white lies didn't hurt a single person on here. Not one. Secondly, we don't know that they were stories, not one ounce of evidence, not one. As far as the delayed shipping on the cards. Is there zero possibility that she gave them to her husband to ship, he says sure babe, no problem. Forgets to ship them the next day, but says yeah baby I shipped em (come on guys, anyone that's been in an adult relationship has done this). I'm not saying any of this IS what happened, I'm just giving possibilities from the other side as I'm tired of the mob ganging up on people.
Up
Prev
Next